22 October 2016
Bond notes stir 500bln pct inflation
Spurned ICC asks SA, Burundi to reconsider
Oppah: Under whites, Zim wasn't this filthy
MP says not Mnangagwa’s frontman
Khupe: fellow MPs suspected I was HIV+
German firm declines offer to print bond notes
Zanu PF says worried Trump may be cheated
Bar lady plunges sharp glass into man’s neck
Falls airport to be commissioned in Nov
Zim to produce 64m litres of milk p/a
Model sues Herald for $100k over HIV claims
Australia: Winky D Disappears down under
Chunga vows to defend Chibuku Super Cup
Warriors Afcon draw fair, says Sunday
Why Mugabe will not fire Robin Hood
Marriage demise: Blame smartphones?
Seewell Mashizha: Waiting for a NEW DAY
Tribute to Kudzayi Mbudzi – ZUNDE
Security guard acquitted of dog sex charge
14/12/2012 00:00:00
by Staff Reporter
Bestiality ... Man denied having sex with dog
Roadblock cop killer was 'heavily drunk'
Mugabe appoints four new High Court judges
Granny murdered in peanuts row
Man bailed after 11 years in remand
2,400 girls raped this year
Man held in gay lover's death
Man sought by US cops living lavishly

A SECURITY guard accused of having sex with a dog has walked after a court dismissed the allegations citing lack of evidence.

Fanuel Tiki, 49, employed by the Fort Group Security Company in Bulawayo, was all smiles as the magistrate declared his innocence.

“The State should have proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the animal in question had been indeed abused,” said Bulawayo provincial magistrate Charity Maphosa.

Tiki was arrested after a fellow employee reported him to police claiming he had caught him on company premises at 2pm having sex with the dog.

But Tiki had vehemently denied the accusations, claiming the complainant, Prince Moyo had a longstanding beef with him.

And in the absence of a smoking gun, the magistrate gave him the benefit of the doubt.

“Without such proof (of the alleged bestiality), it is probable that what the accused is alleging (that Moyo hates him), is substantially true,” said Maphosa.

Seeking to prove his “bad blood” defense, Tiki claimed he had previously censured the informant for reporting late for duty, leading to an argument.

The magistrate concluded that she could not send him to jail as the prosecution had failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

She also expressed reservations about testimonies given by two state witnesses saying it was clear they had some work-related issues with the accused.


Email this to a friend Printable Version Discuss This Story
Share this article:

Digg it






Face Book


comments powered by Disqus
RSS NewsTicker