A COUPLE of years back we bought a 1996 Ford Transit van. Fantastic van it was and very good for purpose. It had a few cosmetic extras but I wished it also had a ‘light’ to show when I was running on reserve tank.
The fuel gauge worked perfectly but sometimes it was difficult to tell if there was enough diesel to go an extra mile or not. Indeed, I ran out of diesel on the road a couple of times and my longsuffering sister, Nom, had to come out to the rescue with a 5 litre can of diesel.
We are living in a world that is running on reserve tank and are about to run out completely, the main tank is empty. We will briefly explore why.
We have been able to identify the first beast of Revelation 13: 1-10 as Papal Rome because of the following points:
(1) it’s a blasphemous power: Rome claims the prerogative of God to forgive sins.
(2) it made war with the saints and overcame them: Rome has killed more people that the first and second world wars put together.
(3) The length of the beast dominion is 42months, which calculates into three and a half years, or 1,260 days; which equates to 1,260 years: the papal supremacy is dated from A.D. 538 and ends A.D.1798 when Pope Pius VI was exiled to France.
(4) 666 – The title of the pope of Rome is “Vicarius Filii Dei” (English: “Vicar of the Son of God”). The name adds to 666.
(5) the beast is worshiped and has world dominion: The papacy is so influential and powerful that nearly every major country consults her before making major policy moves. Her “large diplomatic corps maintains relations with more than 100 nations.” U.S. News and World Report, October 30, 1978, p. 24.
I hope you realise that we are not talking about individuals, not even Benedict XVI or the late John Paul II. Benedict is a lovely man with a nice smile and he loves children. I have nothing against the guy. But the papal system is the first antichrist beast power of Revelation 13.
Now watch what else John saw, “Then I saw another beast coming up out of the earth, and he had two horns like a lamb and spoke like a dragon” [Revelation 13:11]. The previous verse, v10, mentions the first beast being led into captivity and this happened in the year 1798.
The second beast was seen emerging out of the earth round about the same time. There is only one nation that arose at this time. The United States declared its independence in 1776, voted the Constitution in 1787, adopted the Bill of Rights in 1791, and was clearly recognised as a world power by 1798.
A nation enters prophecy when the work and destiny of God’s people are definitely linked with it. The timing obviously fits America. Remember that beasts in Bible prophecy symbolise nations or world powers (Daniel 7:17, 23). “The fourth beast shall be a fourth kingdom on earth” [v. 23].
This nation arises “out of the earth” instead of out of the water as did the first beast mentioned in Revelation 13. We know, from the same book, that water symbolises areas of the world that have a large population. “The waters which you saw, where the harlot sits, are peoples, multitudes, nations, and tongues” [Revelation 17:15]. Therefore, the earth represents the opposite. It means that this new nation would arise in an area of the world that had been virtually unpopulated before the late 1700s. It could not arise among the crowded and struggling nations of the Old World. It had to come up in a sparsely populated continent.
Horns, in this case, represent America’s two governing principles: civil and religious liberty. These two governing principles have also been labelled “republicanism” (a government without a king) and “Protestantism” (a church without a pope).
Other nations since ancient times had taxed people to support a state religion. Most had also oppressed religious dissidents. But America established something entirely new: Freedom to worship as you wish without government interference or control and with government protection.
The absence of crowns signifies a republican form of government, rather than a monarchy. Lamb-like horns denote an innocent, young, non-oppressive, peace-loving, and spiritual nation. Jesus is referred to as a lamb in the book of Revelation. So this new government was trying to uphold His principles. No other power on earth could possibly fit the characteristics and time slot of the lamb-horned beast, except America.
It doesn’t end there. This beast is schizophrenic. It looks like a lamb but speaks like a dragon. The dragon is Satan, who works through various governments of the earth to establish his evil kingdom and crush God’s church by persecuting and destroying His people. Satan’s aim always has been to usurp God’s power and throne and to force people to worship and obey him.
So “speaking as a dragon” means that the United States (under the influence of Satan) will, in the end time, force people to worship contrary to conscience or be punished.
Using only the internal evidence, what will the United States do?
(1) “exercises all the authority of the first beast in his presence” [Revelation 13:12]. America will become a persecuting power that will force people to go against their conscience, as did papal Rome (the first beast).
(2) “causes the earth and those who dwell in it to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed” [Revelation 13:12]. The USA will lead the nations of the world in forcing worship of, and allegiance to, the papal Antichrist. The issue is always worship. Who will you worship and obey? Will it be Christ your Creator and Redeemer, or Antichrist? Every soul on earth will finally worship one or the other. The entire approach will appear to be deeply spiritual, attended by incredible miracles, which will deceive billions (Revelation 13:3).
Those who refuse to join this movement will be considered godless radicals and fit for extermination. Small wonder Jesus labels Protestant America of the end time a “false prophet” (Revelation 19:20; 20:10), because it will appear spiritual and trustworthy but instead will be satanic in its conduct.
(3) “telling those who dwell on the earth to make an image to the beast who was wounded by the sword and lived” [Revelation 13:14]. The USA will make an image to the beast by legislating religious practice. It will pass laws requiring worship and force people to either obey them or face death. This action is a copy or image of the church-state combination that the papacy utilized at the height of her power during the Dark Ages when millions were slain for their faith. America will combine civil government and apostate Protestantism in a “marriage” that will support the papacy. It will then influence all the nations of the world to follow her example. So, the papacy will gain worldwide support one more time and one last time.
(4) “And cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed” [Revelation 13:15]. The USA, as head of this international movement, will next influence the nations of the world to impose a universal death sentence upon all who refuse to worship the beast or his image. This worldwide alliance will, in the name of Christ, substitute the Holy Spirit’s persuasion by army and policeman’s power and will force worship.
This may be difficult for some to believe, seeing we live in an enlightened world but Jesus’ words are always totally reliable and true. “And there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation, even to that time. And at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone who is found written in the book” [Daniel 12:1].
We ask ourselves how this can happen in a nation from whose Article 1 of the Amendments to the Constitution we read: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” We have seen how laws can be quickly changed for “security reasons”.
From the Declaration of Independence, we quote: “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.”
Twenty two years before the English colonies in America declared their independence of the motherland, John Wesley, in his notes on Revelation 13, written in 1754, says of the two-horned beast: “He has not yet come, though he cannot be far off; for he is to appear at the end of the forty two months of the first beast. And he had two horns like a lamb – a mild, innocent appearance.” (John Wesley. Notes on Revelation, 1754. p.457). Isn’t this awesome?
The Reformers knew that the papacy would continue persecuting them until 1798 (the end of the bible prophecy), and round about that time the second beast will be appearing! Wow!
Yours truly came upon these biblical truths around 1986. Then there were two superpowers, the USA and the Soviet block, the USSR. We believed even then that the Biblical prophecy mentioned only one superpower, the USA, and therefore wondered how this would happen.
I personally thought there would be a Third World War after which only one would emerge. But we saw President Ronald Reagan and Pope John Paul II destroy the Soviet Union without a single shot being fired, paving the way for the USA to have global sway. God’s word always comes to pass!
Clifford Goldstein, in his book, The Saving of America, concludes: “The only time religion is mentioned in the Constitution is to stop the government from making laws that would either establish, discriminate against, or prohibit it. If the government is not allowed to make laws regarding religion, then it will never be able to persecute or discriminate against on the basis of religion. Here is the secret of America’s great religious freedoms” (p. 37).
Revelation 13 says America will ultimately speak like a dragon. The exact detail of how these things will take place was not revealed to the prophet, but events will come, and come quickly. The First Amendment to the Constitution must either be abolished or ignored. America is the last frontier of liberty. God’s people have journeyed down the centuries and died under the flags of many nations, but they have had a double loyalty — to God first, and to their country second.
Today, most Protestants don’t even know what their founders protested against. Yet, it is also true that whatever they protested against, the Mother Church has not renounced one bit.
The cover on Time Magazine of June 7, 2010, read: “Why Being Pope Means Never Having to Say You’re Sorry.” The papacy is still as infallible as it were in the Dark Ages. Poor Benedict, how will he face his 1.2 billion members who demand a very modern kind of accountability for the decades of cases of child abuse by priests and cover-ups by their bishops?
He’s visiting the UK in September 2010 on a mission of bringing England, Scotland and Wales back into the fold of the “one true church.” He will offer prayers to the Virgin Mary for the conversion of England asking her to ‘intercede for our separate brethren, that with us in the one true fold they may be united to the supreme Shepherd, the Vicar of thy Son.’
For Scotland: ‘Lord, win over the minds of our countrymen so that all men see your spirit, truth and life in the one true church which you founded.’
For Wales: ‘Have mercy on the people who dwell in Wales. Grant to them the precious gift of faith, and unite them in the one true church founded by thy divine Son.’
He will succeed because “all the world marvelled and followed the beast” [Rev 13:3]. The bible does not lie.
The Christian Coalition along with Christian Churches Together and Catholic Campaign for America have developed a ten point agenda for America that they want to implement at the federal and state levels by law. These ten amendments were updated at the Fuller Theological Seminary on March 1, 2007.
Most of them are designed to uphold the principles that are important to Christian people, such as marriage between one man and one woman, public prayer, references to God in the pledge of allegiance and on coins and bills, judicial integrity, limits on eminent domain, the right to bear arms, etc. But ironically, the seventh amendment on their list is a call for a national day of rest. I wonder what day they will eventually choose, but we hope, as Christians, they will follow their Master’s footsteps, “And as His custom was, He went into the synagogue on the Sabbath day, and stood up to read” [Luke 4:16], anything else will be antichrist.
One inspired writer had this to say, “God’s word has given warning of the impending danger; let this be unheeded, and the Protestant world will learn what the purposes of Rome really are, only when it is too late to escape the snare. She is silently growing into power. Her doctrines are exerting their influence in legislative halls, in the churches, and in the hearts of men.
“She is piling up her lofty and massive structures in the secret recesses of which her former persecutions will be repeated. Stealthily and unsuspectedly she is strengthening her forces to further her own ends when the time shall come for her to strike. All that she desires is vantage ground, and this is already being given her. We shall soon see and shall feel what the purpose of the Roman element is. Whoever shall believe and obey the word of God will thereby incur reproach and persecution.”
Unfortunately, so many of God’s people don’t seem to care. Thousands upon hundreds of thousands are sound asleep like the ten virgins in Jesus’ parable. They keep watching their ungodly movies. They keep doing things God has forbidden. They keep listening to music that makes the angel’s weep and invites Satan into their hearts and homes. They continue eating things that becloud their minds so that they cannot hear the still small voice. They forget that we are in the antitypical solemn Day of Atonement. The judgement day is upon us!
It is sad to think that again religious liberty must be in jeopardy, but this is one of the signs that the world is running on reserve tank. Soon the King will come to deliver His people everywhere. The God who cared for His own in the fiery furnace and in the den of lions will be a refuge to His people in the last day.
The USA has been a refuge for the oppressed in times of persecution. It is their last homeland this side of eternity. Someday it will pass away and Christ’s eternal kingdom will cover the earth.



SDA…. Someone from your church told me that Pope John Paul was the Beast because ‘the Beast gets wounded miraculously recovers’ as what happened to Pope John Paul when he was shot from close range and didn’t die. But Alas he died! And so now you change goalposts? If anything your rumblings are starting to shake my faith rather than uplift me!
Lot Masiane siyana ne this lot of hogwash..
Visit Zimbabwean SDAs on facebook – http://facebook.com/zimsda
Go there it objectively, without any pre-conceptions and judgments and I am sure you will see that although the people carrying a message might be sinners and imperfect, the message itself will not be.
The crux of the matter is: what is the truth, what is the message and what does the Bible say.
Focus not on man, for he has fallen short of the glory of God (Rom. 3:23) and needs salvation by grace, through faith (Eph 2:
Pope does not have a title called Vicarius Filii Dei(Vicar of the son of God),but it is vicar of Jesus Christ and that in Latin does not add to 666. All the rest of your arguments including world nations consulting Rome is stupid and untrue. You still cling to old protestant teaching which has been repudiated by modern protestant exegetical studies. Actually the world including the secular media is against the Catholic Church. Time magazines distorted feature on Benedict 16 “Why Being Pope Means Never Having to Say You’re Sorry.” is one example. We all know that the Pope has said sorry many times for the abuse of children for the priests who have done such crimes. The world hates the church because of its unchanging traditionalist teaching on morality. While many protestant denominations have gone the way of the world(for eg. approving gay marriage and gay clergy), the Catholic Church stands against homosexualtiy and other vices. As per statistics they are just below 0.5% of the total Catholic priests in the world. Child sex abuse is not a problem in the Catholic Church.Just google search on protestant clergymen who have abused children you will be stunned.The western media never highlights these cases.
Lot Masiane you believe in many other stupid conspiracy theories. And I think this shows the immaturity of your mind. Well you might be a good man but you are seem to be misinformed or brain washed with 19 th century know nothing protestant bigotry. I exhort you to study true history and theology. May God bless you brother to find the truth
God did not create the Seventh Day Adventist denomination. It is only an invention and creation of ignorant men and women like Ellen G. White. God made one church (Matthew 16 vs 18-20). This true church was established on Pentecost day as recorded in Acts 2 and surely this was not SDA, but the one as recorded in Romans 16 vs 16. No one on earth can create or start a new church on behalf of Jesus Christ. The church was built once and for all by Jesus Christ on Pentecost day and what is expected now is that very church to spread its wings to all places on earth, producing the same church everywhere. Peter did not start his own denomination, Paul did not, James did not, and the rest of the 12 apostles did not. Nobody can do that. Neither can Ellen G. White do that. It is the prerogative of the son of God, Jesus Christ. There is one church (body) as recored in the Ephesians 4 vs 4-9. That body (church) is not made up of many conflicting denominations like the SDA, Roman Catholic, ZAOGA, AFM, FOG, Glad Tidings, and the rest.NO!
Nice stuff neh?
dont you think islam is the beast, it fits the profile perfectly. forcing everyone in these nations to worship a certain way , al quedas declaration of war on the infidel meaning christians. dont you see the outcome as islam is a growing religion, focus your study there and you will find your beast. stop vilifying your brothers in christ.can you imagine the whole world under islam, therein lies yor answer my bretheren.
“Quench not the Spirit.DESPISE NOT PROPHESYINGS.PROVE ALL THINGS. Hold fast that which is good”-1 Thessalonians 5:20-21. Invaluable words of wisdom from the apostle to the Gentiles.Paul is sayings “Hold on! Hold on! Before you despise the words of prophecy and call them by many names, DIG deeper into the subject, PROVE all things if they are so and HOLD FAST that which is good. The reason why the Bereans of Acts 17:11 are called more noble is that when they heard the word they listened intently THEN they went home to burn the midnight candle CHECKING if things were so. This is a question of UNPOPULAR TRUTH versus POPULAR ERROR. Error is so popular that when truth is presented it immediately detected as strange and unacceptable. Truth becomes so strange to most people that they need not waste their time investigating it. It is hogwash at first sight. This is the reason why when Jesus was crucified it was easier to shout “Crucify Him” than otherwise. Human nature demands that we should stampede with the herd than swim against the tide. We generally find it easier to follow mass impulse and this is very detrimental when practised in religious faith because there is never going to be a stampede into heaven. People who join in a stampede do so without even knowing what caused it and where its heading. Heaven, on the other hand is a A PLACE PREPARED FOR THOSE WHO ARE PREPARED FOR IT!
“You must be born again!” This is a basic biblical truth and yet it was so strange to Nicodemus that it set his mind spinning. In fact, it brought him to such a state of sensory overload that he asked Jesus how to get to his mothers womb. If I had heard Nicodemus saying those words I would have probably said he was a fool but such is the response when unpopular truth is presented. God’s truth is so glorious and unpopular that we do not have sufficient capacity in our sensibilities to handle it all at once! This is the reason why I do not seek to insult anyone on this forum who dismisses facts of history and biblical truth at first sight. I do understand that although God’s truth is absolute, its revelation has to be progressive so that we catch up with it. Nicodemus was a Pharisee and a member of the Sanhedrin and yet Jesus said the truth not found in the volumes of rabbinic inventions.
The problem is not with what Lot has written but with the fact that few are willing to PROVE it for themselves and to HOLD FAST if indeed it is true. Nicodemus did what most of us can not do. Although he was dazzled by the truth, he started investigating right away and he loved the truth more than social status and popular acceptances.
He jumped out of the crowd and joined the little flock that travels along the narrow way.
What Lot writes is 99% correct, although he misses some things scripturally! The main problem is that Lot Masiyane does not seem to know that this MARK OF THE BEAST is the greatest deception the devil has ever poked on God’s people. ALL denominations (including SDA) will unknowingly ENTHRONE the ANTICHRIST that’s foretold in the Bible.
Let us note the penalty for those who will join this false unity as written in Revelations 14:9-10 that states: “If any man worship the BEAST (the “power” of Papal Roman Empire) and the IMAGE (the Ecumenical Movement of the Protestant Churches which includes SDA!), and receive his MARK in his forehead or in his hand, the same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb.”
Now, here is where Lot and his lot are found to be involved.
“In verse 17, it emphatically shows that BEAST will gain absolute control of the commerce of the earth, for no man can buy or sell apart from her.”
People are meant to receive the mark of the beast in:
1) Their right hand signifying obedient service,
2) Or in their forehead signifying they have adopted its Trinitarian doctrine
Now you might ask how Lot and his gang are involved. Lot supports FOOTBALL thus subscribing to point number one! He is obedient to the beast’s entertainment service that the Vatican banking system thrives on. So don’t be fooled brothers and sisters!
Lot and his gang also subscribe to the Trinitarian doctrine, which is no different from what the pope institutes! So, though Lot does it on Saturday, the pope prefers Sunday! What a sad story!
Chelsea plays most of its matches on a Saturday!! I think Lot’s Elders should watch him every Saturday and if he is breaking this 4th commandment this way, the consequences/punishments written (in the Old Testament) for breaking it should be applied to their fullest extend! LOL!!
I hope he is not the ELDER!! Ha Ha!!
Well Ronald,in the subject above I did not read anywhere in the context the mention of Seventh Day Adventist,it is prophecy.Whenever Jesus spoke,His words divided the audience,John 7;37-43,In John 9 there was division again because of what He said.In John 10 there was division again because of what Jesus did.Adventists aught cause divisions not from motivation of being unkind but by simply preaching the word without mixture.Revelation 18:2And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. 3For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.No other denomination dares preach this,Why? That message is unusual in a Sunday church.I have no problem with Sunday churches but no one is forcing anyone here. Any true Christian in the world would lift Jesus not a church.Matthew remind to go into the world and preach,weather people accept it or not but the message has been put across,it is the work of holy spirit that convict people not our effort or strength. You are loosing the concept “RONALD”Its not SDA it is the gospel of Jesus,it causes division as I have said above
Ellen G. white has killed your brain. I bet on my last penny you were born and raised in the SA. All your arguments azwisa ubuhlungu.
Its pathetic that you always hallow the day over Jesus Christ. Not to be controversial you are like the christ Embassy people who hallow Chris(they always say Pastor Chris says etc). and you always say Saturday. Awu suka bo!I am not Catholic but of late I have realised that it stands for the truth e.g. against use of condoms but faithfulness, no gay marriages, no euthanasia etc to the wrath of the media. I used to hallow the date till none other than my mother who was and is catholic told me eSabatha, eRoma, eZAOGA, eBretheren eVictory bakhona abazongena ezulwini njalo bakhona abangasoze bangene akungenwa ngechurch!
The things which the above gentle man has written are partly true and partly false.Fact is fact regardless of the source.Lot Masiane is a very confused seventh day adventist who is equally lost as the pope and the catholic demonic cult.Yes islam has got the beast properties,yes the catholic is very evil and demonic……but equally on the same vein Ellen G white was a heretic who did not obey 1 cor14vs34….you have a feminist posing as a servant of God.In the bible you dont hear of God raising a woman to be a preacher,the only woman preacher recorded in the bible was the wicked Jezeebul .I know the above facts will put me in troble with modern day feminists posing as women pastors…Godly women are people who abey the scriptures like Sarah.Jesus had 12 disciples and hence the only scripture satanists misqoute is Galatians 3 vs 28…this scripture is twisted to mean woman can be pastors …the truth and context of it is about salvation and not function in the house of God….So Ellen G white and the pope are in the same boat…this makes lot a heretic all the same……..yes the beast in the bible has something to do with islam…….but that does not live the vatican and Ellen Gwhite as saints …they are birds of the same feather…..Mohammed….the popes and Ellen G white are all heretics
Themba do you believe in the trinity or not…Do you believe Jesus was God or not.The issue is simple Jesus is God.
God knows but i believe what was prophecised is already happening
thank you Lot and PfendeH, the truth needs to be preached to all the world. to those who call you controversial without searching the scriptures, this is not scaremongering or some stupid conspiracy theory it is prophesy. get your facts from the bible and read up on some history.remember, the truth is never popular, never was and never will be.
Dear Lot. In heaven you wont find members of SDA, Zaoga, Johane Masowe, FIF, Methodists, Anglicans, Glad Tidings, traditionalists, buddists, islamists or indeed Catholics. You will find there sons and daughters of God living in eternal peace. I dont know which route you will be taking to get there but I certainly hope and pray to see you there. In the meantime please dont lay landmines in my foot path.
Gnoticism is the way to go. All modern christians are hypocrites, especially SDA. These are the secret sayings that the living Jesus spoke and Didymos Judas Thomas recorded.
1. And he said, “Whoever discovers the interpretation of these sayings will not taste death.”
2. Jesus said, “Those who seek should not stop seeking until they find. When they find, they will be disturbed. When they are disturbed, they will marvel, and will reign over all. [And after they have reigned they will rest.]”
3. Jesus said, “If your leaders say to you, ‘Look, the (Father’s) kingdom is in the sky,’ then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, ‘It is in the sea,’ then the fish will precede you. Rather, the (Father’s) kingdom is within you and it is outside you.
When you know yourselves, then you will be known, and you will understand that you are children of the living Father. But if you do not know yourselves, then you live in poverty, and you are the poverty.”
4. Jesus said, “The person old in days won’t hesitate to ask a little child seven days old about the place of life, and that person will live.
Why it is dangerous to quote from the bible
Dear Dr. Lot:
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God’s Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the other specific laws and how to follow them:
When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord – Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness – Lev.15:19- 24. The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can’t I own Canadians?
I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?
A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination – Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don’t agree. Can you settle this?
Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?
Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?
I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? – Lev.24:10-16. Couldn’t we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)
I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God’s word is eternal and unchanging.
Your devoted fan,
Jim
The church contains the saved, the saved are added to the one church (Acts 2:47). No one outside the one church can be saved.
What a lot of hogwash from Lot. Your argument about “Vicarius Filii Dei” is a fudge – changed the “U” to a “V” and gave it a value of “5″. The link to 666 comes from 1866 writings of an SDA called Uriah Smith. Uriah Smith & Ellen G White also believed that some human being are close to animals and included Bushmen, Red Indians and Hottentots – Lot they thought you are closer to animals since you are dark skinned. You conveniently ignore this but hold on to Uriah’s hogwash on 666. Your church is not even agreed on this interpretation. If Jesus was here, do you think he will be spending time talking about this hogwash? Remember the Pharisees!! Revelation is a complicated book and I do not trust anyone who claim to have monopoly of its explanation. What is the point of demonising others – Catholics, USA, what next?
Sir..
After reading this it will be difficult to take teaching from you again.
There is enough things you can dwell on that bring peace to the soul and prosperity to lives of people.. this is not it.. non – believers will look at this and say we are lunatics and they are right if this is all we have to offer!!!
Lot Masiane you rubbed my piece because of my factual contributions…..ufuze izanu erigger ama election.I told you the truth about Ellen G white and her Jezeebul origins and you rub out my contribution…..ufuze izanupf
Lot is 100 percent correct,keep on writting,i wish if i was talented like you,NEVER GIVE UP.i want respond to Silesta Pope John Paul II wasnt the beast but the office of the Papacy represent the beast.I want also to support Ronald that its true that God did not create the SDA church but its not true that the Church of God was formed at pentacost but the first church was established in the garden of Eden,qualifications of Gods church throughout the ages were God fearing men who keeps Gods ten commandments including the one that says `Remember the Sabbath day`Christ was a Sabbath keeper and also his desciples.AS I see it the SDA church is the Lord`s church since it holds the testimony of Jesus Christ and keeps the Law of God including the Sabbath law.Let your light shine Lot
Dear Etiwel Mutero
In Matthew 16 vs 18, Jesus says ” I will build my church”. This means His church was not yet in existence but He was going to build one in future. So how can you say the church was established in Eden? There was never a church in the old testament but judaism only and laws specifically to israelites only, and not to all people. The church came in the new testament and it encompassed all tribes on earth, not Israelites only, as was the order in the old testament.
Saturday (Sabbath) or First day?
What day did early Christians worship on???
The first day (Sunday) IS THE LORD’S DAY!
Original Quotes on this page!
The Historical Record!
Christians always worshipped on the first day (Sunday)
They state that they stopped keeping the Sabbath to worship on Sunday started with the apostles. None of say they kept the seventh day Sabbath. The only mention of Sabbath keeping was by Eusebius in 300 AD by a cult-sect known as the Ebionites, who Eusebius says also worshipped on the first day. (Ebionites were a cult of Judaizers who enforced circumcision, rejected Apostle Paul’s teachings, denied Jesus’ virgin birth and his deity.)
They partook of the Lord’s Supper (communion) every first day.
They called the first day (Sunday) the Lord’s day.
They called the day Jesus rose from the dead, the Lord’s Day.
They said the reason they worshipped on the first day, was because it was a weekly memorial of the day Jesus rose from the dead!
They outright state that no one prior to Moses (Adam, Noah, Abraham etc) ever kept the Sabbath because it was Moses who first gave the Sabbath law and the ten commandments to man!
Augustine actually stated that Christians are bound to keep 9 of the ten Commandments [because the New Testament repeats and re-introduces them in a different form] but are free to break the Sabbath!
The earliest Christians never considered Sunday to be a rest day or the Sabbath. You will observe that the first mention of Sunday being a day of rest was in 220AD by Origen. This is the beginning of the current false doctrine, that Sunday is the Christian Sabbath, as taught by most churches today.
While Sabbatarians will quote 20th century authors who guess about what happened 1900 years earlier, we quote Christians whose writings are 1900 years old and spoke what they saw!
The record of history, from the Resurrection of Christ, Christians have always worshipped on the first day of the week (Sunday) and never on the Sabbath (7th day). Sunday is not a Christian Sabbath or a day of rest, or a holy day to be kept. It is the day God requires all Christians to gather together to worship and eat the Lord’s Supper (communion, break bread) Acts 20:7. Christians do not keep the ten commandment law of Moses. This is not to say that Christians are free to steal, murder and commit adultery, just because the 10 commandments have been abolished. No! Christians are under a new law, a better Law, the law of Christ, (Gal 6:2) a better covenant (Heb 8:6-7).
The 10 commandment law including the requirement to keep the Sabbath day were abolished at the cross along with all the rest of the law of Moses. God gave a covenant at Mt. Sinai through Moses to the Jews. It is called the first/old covenant/testament. The ten commandments are the foremost visible representation of this first/old covenant was replaced by a new covenant called, among other things “the law of Christ”. 100% of the old covenant was abolished. No part of the Old Covenant remains in force. No one prior to Moses (Abraham or Adam) ever heard of the Sabbath law much less kept it. The very first time that anyone was commanded to keep the Sabbath was in Exodus 16. The word “Sabbath” is not even found in the book of Genesis. Gen 2:2-3 was written by Moses to tell Jews at Sinai the meaning behind WHY they were to keep the Sabbath, NOT WHEN the Sabbath was instituted.
The first historical record of methodical Sabbath Keeping by Christians who stopped worshipping on the first day of the week, was two active Anabaptist leaders, Andreas Fisher and Oswald Glait, became the pioneer and promoters of the Sabbath in 1527 AD. Both were former priests who had sacrificed the priesthood to become first Lutherans, and then Anabaptists. Glait and Fischer, who had been taught the false doctrine of the Catholic and Lutheran churches, that Sunday is the Sabbath, were astonished to read in the Bible that the Sabbath was indeed the 7th day! When they began to teach this, theologians were sent to persuade them to abandon what they called the “Jewish Sabbath.” Both of them suffered a martyr death, largely due to their Sabbatarian views. Sabbatarians owe a debt of gratitude to these Sabbath pioneers whose work later influenced the origin of the Seventh-day Baptist church. The latter (Joseph Bates) has been instrumental in helping the early Adventists and other Christians to rediscover the Sabbath. Historically, it was in 1844 the first Seventh-day Adventists (known then as Millerites) started keeping the Sabbath, introduced to them by a Seventh-day Baptist named Joseph Bates, who convinced their Methodist minister that the Bible teaches us to keep the Sabbath. But Seventh-day Adventists are convinced that God chose Ellen White and the modern Seventh-day Adventist movement as the medium through which to reveal and confirm this “truth” through direct inspiration and revelation. Although Adventists believe that a tiny unknown remnant has always kept the Sabbath day, (like the Seventh-day Baptist preacher mentioned above) only in the 19th century did God, through the Seventh-day Adventist church, restore in any measurable way, by direct revelation, the truth that the day Christians worship was Saturday.
Amazing Facts about the Sabbath!
And other Questions Sabbatarians don’t like to be asked!
Amazing Facts about the Sabbath and other questions!
If every man from Adam to Moses kept the Sabbath, why is the Hebrew word for the weekly Sabbath found in the ten commandments, never found in the book of Genesis? Why is no one before Moses ever being told to keep the Sabbath. Why are there no examples of anyone keeping the Sabbath?
Why were the Patriarchs never instructed about he Sabbath, but were instructed regarding: offerings: Gen 4:3-4, Altars Gen 8:20, Priests: Gen 14:18, Tithes: Gen 14:20, Circumcision: Gen 17:10, Marriage: Gen 2:24 & Gen 34:9. Why would God leave out the “all important” Sabbath command?
If the fact that God wrote the 10 commandments on stone proves they are forever, then whatever happened to the two stone tablets that God gave Adam at the beginning of time? Why is Moses the first one to see a stone tablet written by the finger of God?
Why is the weekly Sabbath commandment never quoted in the New Testament?
Why is the Sabbath the only one of the ten commandments that are said to be “throughout your generations”, the usual phrase that indicates it was a temporary ceremonial law only for the Jews?
Why is there no example of exclusively Christians coming together on the Sabbath day as a church or prayer meeting after the resurrection of Christ?
Why is there no command in the New Testament for Christians to keep the Sabbath holy?
While Paul taught in the synagogues up to 84 times, why does the Bible never say he kept the sabbath?
If Paul’s action of preaching to non-believers 84 times in the book of Acts on the Sabbath make him a Sabbath keeper, is a Seventh-day Adventist pastor a Sunday keeper if we invite him for 84 Sundays in a row to teach us about God’s word?
How could Adam, Noah and Abraham keep the Sabbath, when Deuteronomy 5:2-4 says that the 10 commandment covenant (see was “not made with any of the fathers of Israel who lived before Moses.”
If we must follow the example of Jesus in all things like keeping the Sabbath, then why do Sabbatarians not follow the example of Jesus in circumcision, animal sacrifices and keeping Passover?
If the Sabbath was for Gentiles and Adam, Noah and Abraham, then why is the Sabbath a sign to remind their exodus from Egypt? Exodus 16:23,29; 31:13-18. Were either Abraham or Seventh-day Adventists ever slaves in Egypt?
If the Sabbath law is still in force, then why do they not stone their own members when they break the Sabbath as the law said?
Ellen G. White, who is considered inspired by Seventh-day Adventists, said that the Pope changed the Sabbath in about 321 AD. Why do all Adventists today reject their inspired prophet and say the change of the Sabbath occurred in about 140 AD? If White was wrong about this, was she wrong when she traveled to heaven and saw the 4th commandment glowing brighter than all the rest?
If the current position of the Seventh-day Adventist church is that the change from Saturday to Sunday took place in 140 AD, doesn’t that mean that they have come a long way from Whites 325 AD and have only 40 more years to travel to reach the truth of the Apostolic age?
If the change from Saturday to Sunday happened, why is there absolutely no discussion of this change of actual day for the first 600 years of church history. Merely calling Sunday the Sabbath doesn’t count!
If Sabbatarians reject White’s inspiration, that Constantine change the Sabbath day to Sunday, why do they keep bringing Constantine up as proof? If Constantine changed the Sabbath to Sunday, why does here merely legislate that work must stop on Sunday with no actual mention of the day being moved?
If the first/old covenant was abolished according to Heb 8:13 and the Ten commandment law was that first covenant (Ex 34:27-28; 1 Kings 8:9,21; Heb 9:1-4), then why do Sabbatarians want to keep the first/old covenant?
Why is the universal record of history (75-500AD) 100% in unanimous agreement that Christians never kept the Sabbath (7th day) and have always worshipped on Sunday?
Why is the universal record of history (75-500AD) 100% in unanimous agreement that Christians ate the Lord’s Supper every Sunday in the tradition of Acts 20:7?
Why is the universal record of history (75-500AD) 100% in unanimous agreement that Christians always called Sunday the Lord’s Day because, they said, this was the day Jesus rose from the dead?
Why has no Sabbatarian every produced even one historical quote (75-500AD) that says Christians kept the Sabbath?
If the Sabbath is not a ceremonial law, then why is it lumped into the same identical class of “holy convocations” as the rest of the Jewish feast days? Lev 23:2; Ex 20:9; 31:17
If the 10 commandments remain but the book of law was abolished, then why did God put two copies of the 10 commandments in the book of the law? Ex 20; Deut 5
How can there possibly be an difference between “the law of God” and the “Law of Moses” when God gave the Law of Moses (Ezra 7:6; Neh 8:1) and Moses gave the Law of God (Neh 10:29; 2 Chron 34:14)?
If there is a distinction between the moral and ceremonial laws, why are the Jewish feast days called part of the Law of the Lord? (2 Chron 331:3)
If there is a distinction between the moral and ceremonial laws, why in a single chapter of Nehemiah 8are the following phrases all used interchangeably: “book of the law of Moses” v1, “the law” v2, “book of the law” v3, “the law of god” v8, “book of the law of god” v18?
Why are the two most important commandments contained within the “ceremonial law of Moses that was Sabbatarians say was nailed to the cross? (Matthew 22:36-40)
Why did Jesus say Moses gave the 10 commandment law: “Thou shalt not kill” in Jn 7:19?
If the Sabbath cannot change, because God cannot change (Mal 3:6) then what about all the other feast days and laws that changed? Heb 7:12. And why did Jesus give a “a new commandment” in John 13:34?
If the ten commandments are going to be in heaven, what is the use of “thou shalt not commit adultery”, if there is no marriage in heaven? Lk 20:34-35
If the Sabbath was given to all men, why were Gentiles called “strangers”. Why were Gentiles outside the gates not required to keep the Sabbath? Ex 20:10.
How could the Sabbath be a sign between God and Israel, if all nations were expected to keep it? Ex 31:17
Why did God send the Jews into Babylonian Captivity for breaking the Sabbath, but never ever criticized any Gentiles for never keeping the Sabbath?
Why did God often criticize the Gentiles via the prophets for moral violations, but never for not keeping the Sabbath?
If the Gentiles were supposed to keep the Sabbath, why are they called “strangers of the Covenant” in Eph 2:12?
If the term, “the law” always means the 10 commandments, then why is Leviticus called “The Law” in Mt 22:35ff, Numbers called “The Law” in Mt 12:5, Deuteronomy called “The Law” in Mt 22:35f, Psalms called “The Law” in Jn 10:34,45, Rom 3:10-12; 3:13-14,19, the Prophets called “The Law” in 1 Cor 14:21 and the Ten commandments are called “The Law” that is abolished in Rom 7:4-7?
If the term “commandments” always means the 10 commandments, then why are the laws that are not part of the ten commandments but called commandments in Mt 19:16-19 not also included?
If the term “commandments” always means the 10 commandments, then what did Paul call the injunction for prophet’s wives to keep silent in the assemblies, a “commandment of the Lord” in 1 Cor 14:37?
If the term “keep my commandments” always means the 10 commandments, then why is this a new commandment? Jn 15:10-12 + Jn 13:34.
If only the ten commandments are going to endure until heaven and earth pass away, why did Jesus say the law AND THE PROPHETS? Mt 5:17-18
When Jesus was asked, “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?” why did Jesus NOT QUOTE from the 10 commandments, but from the abolished ceremonial law of Moses? Matthew 22:36-40
If the 10 commandments are the highest and most complete expression of God’s will, then why did it lack the two most important commandments? Matthew 22:36-40 where is the prohibition against drunkeness, homosexuality and fornication?
If the 10 commandments are the highest and most complete expression of God’s will, then why did Jesus give a new commandment to “love one another, even as I have loved you” John 13:34. Where were the Jews told to love their neighbor as Yahweh loved them?
If Christians worshipping on Sunday is equal to Sun Worship, then is Adventists worshipping on Saturday equal to Saturn worship?
If Sabbatarians will boldly quote “scholars” who are really Bible trashers and skeptics who claim “the origin of Sunday worship is entirely pagan”, like Arthur Weigall in his ridiculous little book, “the paganism in our Christianity”, will these same Sabbatarians turn a few pages later where these same authors say the origin of the Sabbath is also pagan? “I have, already mentioned that Sunday, too, was a pagan holy-day; and in this chapter I propose to discuss the origin of this custom of keeping one day in the week as a Sabbath, or “day of rest,’ and’ to show that the practice was forcefully opposed by Jesus Christ. The origin of the seven-day week which was used by the Jews and certain other peoples, but not till, later by the Greeks or Romans, is to be sought in some primitive worship of the moon (The Paganism in Our Christianity, Arthur Weigall, 1928, p209,210-211)
If the Sabbath is a moral law, why did Jesus say that David, the priests, a man with his donkey could all break the Sabbath without sin? Mt 12:1-14; Mk 2:23f, Lk 13:10-17; 14:1-6 Jn 5:8-18; 7:19-24; 9:14-16.
If the Sabbath is a moral law, why did God grow tired of the Jews keeping it and told them to stop keeping the Sabbath? Isa 1:13-14 Did God ever grow weary of anyone not committing adultery or murder, and tell them to be immoral and kill?
If the Sabbath is a moral law, how could Jesus break it without sinning? Jn 5:18
If one of the distinctions between the ten commandments was proven by the fact they were written by the finger of God, why did Moses copy them out twice with his own hand? How can there be any distinction between the 10 commandments in the ark and the book of the law beside the ark, if the book contained two copies of exactly what was in the ark?
Why are the terms “ceremonial law” and “moral law” never found in the Bible. Why is the word ceremonial or any of its roots never found in the same verse as the word LAW and why is the word moral or any of its roots never found in the same verse as the word LAW?
If there is a distinction between moral and ceremonial laws, why do “God’s laws” and “the law of God” contain ceremonial laws. Why do “Moses law” and the “law of Moses” contain moral laws?
If there is a distinction between moral and ceremonial laws, why does the “law of God” command animal sacrifices Lk 2:23-24 and the “law of the Lord” contains burnt offerings 2 Chron 31:3; 1 Chron 16:40?
If there is a distinction between moral and ceremonial laws, then why is the book of the law filled with moral laws not contained in the 10 commandments?
If there is a distinction between the Law of the Lord and the Law of Moses, why in 2 Chron 35:26 are “the acts of Josiah and his deeds of devotion as written in the law of the Lord”?
If there is a distinction between moral and ceremonial laws, then why does the Law of God include new moons, solemn feast days: Ps 81:3-4?
If there is a distinction between the Law of the Lord and the Law of Moses, why did the law tell Israel to dwell in tents: Neh 8:14?
If Jesus came to fulfill the law and the prophets, then didn’t Mt 5:17 say that only then would they be abolished before heaven and earth pass away? If the law and the prophets are still in force, doesn’t that prove Jesus didn’t fulfill the law completely?
When you ask me, “if the 10 commandments are abolished, does that mean we can steal”, can I ask you, “when you travel from Canada to the USA, does that mean you can steal? Is it possible that two completely different “codes of law” (law of Moses vs. law of Christ) have the same laws just like Canada and the USA?
If the Jewish law against eating pork was abolished by Christ, why do Sabbatarians continue to enforce what they call, “the ceremonial law of Moses”: Mk 7:18-19; 1 Tim 4:1-4; Rom 14:2; Acts 10:9-16
If the Jewish law of Tithing is forbidden in 2 Cor 9, why do Sabbatarians practice from “ceremonial law of Moses”?
If the Jewish Sabbath was abolished in Col 2:14-16, yet Sabbatarians keep the Sabbath, which itself is the only ceremonial law of the 10 commandments?
Why do you practice Tithing which is Prohibited: 2 Cor 9:7 forbid Eating Pork, which is Permitted: Mk 7:18-19 and keep the Sabbath which is Abolished: Col 2:14-16? Aren’t all three of these ceremonial laws?
When Sabbatarians attempt to prove there is a distinction between the moral vs. ceremonial laws, the law of God vs. the Law of Moses, the 10 commandments vs. and the book of the law, and they shown countless bible passages that destroy any distinction Sabbatarians might dream up, will they at least be honest and admit they need to find some definitive way to create this false distinction that does not exist in the Bible and will try again tomorrow?
Why do you refuse to accept that Col 2:16 contains the Old Testament pattern of referring to the Jewish holy says in a yearly, monthly, weekly sequence as in 1 Chronicles 23:31, 2 Chronicles 31:3, 2 Chronicles 8:13, 2 Chronicles 2:4, Nehemiah 10:33, Ezekiel 45:17, Hosea 2:11, Galatians 4:10?
If the plural “sabbaton” in Col 2:16 cannot refer to weekly Sabbath day, then why does plural “sabbaton” refer to the weekly Sabbath day in Matthew 28:1, Luke 4:16, Acts 16:13, Exodus 20:8 (in Septuagint) Leviticus 23:37-38 (in Septuagint)?
If in Col 2:16, the lack of the definite article before the word “Sabbath” in the Greek proves it cannot refer to the weekly Sabbath, then why does the weekly Sabbath lack the definite article in Matthew 28:1, John 5:9, 10, 16?
If Isa 66:23 proves the Sabbath will be in heaven, will the new moon festival also be there? “from new moon to new moon And from sabbath to sabbath”.
If Hebrews 4 teaches we are to keep the weekly Sabbath, then why does the text say we are to enter a rest that none of the Jews at the time of Joshua in the promised land ever experienced in v 8?
If the Sabbath will endure forever because it is called “eternal” then won’t all the Jewish feasts and circumcision also endure because it is also called eternal in Gen 17:10-14 (same Hebrew word used)
If the Sabbath will endure forever because it is called “holy” then won’t all the Jewish feasts also endure forever because they are also called holy?
If the Sabbath will endure forever because God hallowed it, then won’t Solomon’s temple Ps 65:4; 1 Ki 9:3 and the vessels in the tabernacle Ex 40:9; Num 31:6; 1 Ki 8:4 also endure forever because God hallowed them too?
If the Sabbath will endure forever because it was an eternal sign between God and his people, then shouldn’t we also still practice circumcision Gen 17:11 and Passover Ex 12:13 because it too is called an eternal sign between God and his people?
If it is only through the Sabbath that we can know that it is God who sanctifies us Ex 31:13, then what ever happened to faith in Christ sanctifying us? Any if we should therefore keep the Sabbath, then we must also build the tabernacle, for the Bible says through it we may know it is God who sanctifies us Ezel 37:28?
If the fact that the Sabbath is mentioned in the New Testament after Pentecost proves it is still in force, then does the mention of The Day of Pentecost Acts 2:1, The days of unleavened bread Acts 12:3; 20:6, Days of Purification: Acts 21:26, Animal Sacrifices: Acts 21:26, Circumcision: Acts 16:3, Temple worship: Acts 24:12 prove we must keep these too because they are also mentioned and must therefore also still be in force like the Sabbath?
If Seventh-day Adventists want to deny that their official position is that worshipping on Sunday is the Mark of the Beast, do they realize that the “inspired” Ellen G. White, Uriah Smith, the Advent review and Leo Schreven (who conducts “Revelation seminars” today) all call it the mark of the beast?
Christians can find 21 reasons why the first day of the week is significant to their faith as Christians in the New Testament. Can Sabbatarians find even one reason in the New Testament why the Sabbath has any meaning distinct to Christians?
Did you know that the Jewish Sabbath was significant to the Jews because it was a memoral of this present physical creation and their deliverance from the bondage of Egypt and that the first day of the week is a memorial of our new creation in Christ (2 Cor 5:7) and our deliverance from the bondage of sin. (Gal 4:4-5; Eph 1:7)
Did you know that regardless of whether the Sadducee’s or Pharisee’s method of calculating Pentecost was used the year Christ died, both would calculate Pentecost in Acts 2:1 as the first day of the week. Did you also know that the official position of the Seventh-day Adventist church was that Pentecost in Acts 2:1 fell on a Sunday that year?
Do you realize that the phrase, “that no collections be made when I come” in 1 Cor 16:2 proves the Christians were forbidden from saving up their offerings each week at home and demanded they put it into a common treasury every Sunday?
Did you know that 1 Cor 16:2 actually says, “EVERY 1st day” because the same Greek phrase is also found in Acts 13:14 “appointed elders in EVERY church”. Did you know that you must give every 1st day of the week in to the church’s common treasury?
If Jesus died on Wednesday and rose on the Sabbath rather than a Friday – Sunday duration because you demand a full 72 hours in the grave, then why did Jesus count the Friday – Sunday duration as three days in Lk 13:32?
If Jesus died on Wednesday and rose on the Sabbath rather than a Friday – Sunday duration because you demand a full 72 hours in the grave, why is exactly a 72 hour period called 4 days by Peter in Acts 10:3+9+23+24+30?
If the fact that the 10 commandments were written in stone, that proves they will never be abolished, then where was Adam’s stone copy of the 10 commandments? Why did God not give Adam a stone copy once for all time? Why is it that Moses was first person in history to not only see the 10 commandments, but the first person to hold the stone tablets upon which the 10 commandments were written? Why do Seventh-day Adventists argue that the ten commandment law is no longer written in stone, but in the flesh of the human heart in 2 Corinthians 3:3? (Of course 2 Cor 3:3 says the 10 commandments were abolished and the new Covenant, the law of Christ is written on human hearts)
If only the 10 commandments we can “live”, then why does Ezek 20:11 say this of the “ceremonial law”, “I gave them My statutes and informed them of My ordinances, by which, if a man observes them, he will live.” (Ezek 20:11)?
Dear Ronald
In Gen 2:1-3 there is the first mention of the Sabbath.And then Ex 16 mention the Sabbath,note that this was before God had given Moses the ten commandments.The sabbath had always been kept from Genesis to Revelations.You talked about the first day of the week Sunday and you said Christians changed from Sabbath to Sunday.I partly agree with you that the Sabbath was change but not by Jesus or his disciples but by Catholics,Constantine in particular.Let me remind you that there is only one Lord`s Day, the Sabbath the Seventh Day and not the first day of the week.You will not find a single verse that says Sunday is the Lord`s Day.
1Peter 1 :23 says Being Born Again not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever. Man ought to be born again. And the most important thing is to keep your salvation and know who you are in Christ Jesus. If the seed remains in you you will not follow all these false doctrines. We have our manual the bible lets focus we doers of the word not what the world tells us we are not of the world although we live in the world. We are from above, Praise God!
The responses to this forum are proof people do not reason, the article is about the latter part of revelation 13 with no mention of Ellen G. White or the Seventh-day Adventist Church or was I reading a different one?
There are very few responses that critique the article from a referenced biblical point of view, suffice to say most of the responses are purely emotive lacking in substance at best.
1) Let’s review the facts; there is the 42months(3 and ½ years) prophecy the span of which the beast speak great things and blasphemies against God and it was given unto him to make war with the saints just to mention a few for want of time. Evidently this chapter of Revelation begins with a conjunction word implying the previous chapter owes something to this story as such let’s quickly review chapter 12. Ahh! We find a beast of similar description with seven heads, ten horns and ten crowns, but before this there is a mention of a woman in labour and later on the woman fleas to the wilderness where she has a place prepared of God for 1260days.
The dragon is then named as the serpent the devil…..
The dragon persecuted the woman that gave birth…..
Rev 12:14 She was given the two wings of a large eagle in order to fly to her place in the desert, where she will be taken care of for three and a half years, safe from the dragon’s attack.(GNB)
Ahh! There the link is, the three and a half years, subsequently the 1260 days.
What’s the point of all this? Isa 28:10 And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.
I couldn’t possibly expound and exhaust the arguments for the book of Revelation 12, 13 and Seventeen. I have admittedly barely scratched the surface and clearly I have raised more questions than answers thus all the more reason to read and understand for yourselves as this is a vast topic that needs carefully exploring history with additional attention to the relevant prophecies of Daniel chapter 2,7,8,9 and 10. Really the whole book of Daniel.
Other books like Jeremiah, Ezra, Isaiah, Habakuk and so forth will also add on to the picture to provide much useful information that said, the1260 days are 1260 years of regn as it is said Rev 13:5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.
This bit is certainly satisfied by the catholic church that single handedly committed heinous crimes against the saints in a span lasting 1260 years as outlined in Lot’s article.
Most of the supporting information to this fact is a prelude to this prophecy found in the book of Daniel.
This verse (Rev 13:12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.) tells us that the first beast will come back to power as the follow on beast will cause the earth and tem that dwell in it to worship the first beast.
Can it be any clearer? As clear as mud thus, the notion of Islam being the beast is utterly dispelled.
2) Go through the following verses that are records of Apostle Activities after Jesus’ Ascension and you will see an undeniable picture being painted.
Act 13:14 But when they departed from Perga, they came to Antioch in Pisidia, and went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and sat down.
Act 13:27 For they that dwell at Jerusalem, and their rulers, because they knew him not, nor yet the voices of the prophets which are read every sabbath day, they have fulfilled them in condemning him.
Act 13:42 And when the Jews were gone out of the synagogue, the Gentiles besought that these words might be preached to them the next sabbath.
Act 13:44 And the next sabbath day came almost the whole city together to hear the word of God.
Act 17:2 And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and three sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures,
Act 18:4 And he reasoned in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.
As all Christiandom agree axiomatically that Jesus is the only model to follow, check out what he customary did on the Sabbath.
Luk 4:16 And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the Sabbath day, and stood up for to read.
Some of the bluntest tools, blinded by the devil will argue that there are some things Jesus did that we cannot do, for example be a propitiation for people’s sins, while this is true, it is just an argument for argument’s sake and I use this only as an example by no means exhausting the angles the devil may bring.
In the book of Genesis we are told of a plain supernatural visible to all but ignored by all serve for the eight that entered into the Ark. People saw clearly predator and prey harmoniously walk side by side into the ark with no man leading or directing them and perceived not the wonder unveil because of the sin that blinded them. The Israelites cross the Red sea on dry ground on what should have undoubtedly caused one of the foremost thinkers of the time to diagnose the occurrence as miraculous and cause them to stop and take stoke especially after the plagues that had rigged Egypt but again sin’s blinding quality causes them not to see and hear God’s loud voice. Our Lord Jesus also suffered at the hands of those that saw him do wonders to the resurrecting of a number of people, they also heard his testimony that pieced the heart but sin blinded them too. You see, I am not delusional to think that people will follow the truth when they see it but that does not pre-empt the reason to preach it for heaven rejoices in the repentance of just one soul.
As for the issue with the commandments, I am happy to respond to that but seeing as this isn’t my article, I have to go but leave with this, 1Jn 2:3 And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments.
1Jn 2:4 He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.
Eph 2:15 Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace; (KJV)
So you see from above that the commandments that were abolished are they that are contained in ordinances meaning ceremonial laws, Laws that were shadows of the real McCoy. For know ye not that Mat 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Or that Rom 3:31 Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.
Which law do we then establish if it is abolished?
Was it the pope who this said or our Lord Jesus?
Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Or did he this say?
1Jn 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
The trinity is alive and well.
Well as I said, it’s not my Blog.
The most potent of poisons is truth mixed with a little error.
Sabbath means REST, that’s why you find it throughout the bible.
But when Jesus was magnifying the LAWS under the New Testament, you hear Him saying “Come unto Me and I will give you REST”
So can you see that Jesus magnified it from a day-keeping to Him! After all He is the Lord of the Sabbath.
And for the Trinity, its not scriptural! There is only one Lord and that’s it. That Lord (who is a Spirit) can enmorphe (or envelope) Himself into a Pillar of fire, a cloud as well as Jesus the flesh Man!
Lamb-like horns denote an innocent, young, non-oppressive, peace-loving, and spiritual nation????????? Just tell this to the native american indians who were almost wiped out
Lamb like should tell you it’s like not is, for example like a man doesn’t mean a man it means the subject has qualities of a man. Thank God he says it spoke as a dragon, which speak volumes when we know that the dragon is the devil.