THIS year has been a particularly good one for many migrants from Zimbabwe in the United Kingdom. The decision in RN (see previous posts) has yielded many positive decisions for the fortunate.
Many Zimbabweans that have lived in this country for more than five years have been granted refugee status. They have formed relationships and families and in some cases we now have a scenario where one partner has been granted refugee status, and the other has not.
There are also instances where one spouse /partner has gone forward to make a claim, whilst the other has not. I will give a typical example.
Mai and Baba came to the UK in 2001. They renewed their visas as students until 2005 when the college they were attending closed down. They both became illegal. In December 2008, Mai heard about asylum from church and realised that she had a valid asylum claim.
She tried to convince Baba to come forward so they could make their claim together. Baba refused and said he did not want to have anything to do with the claim. Mai duly made her claim and was granted refugee status with the children in February 2009.
Baba is now the only family member with a precarious immigration status. The situation is causing problems for the family as Baba lost his job. The family cannot live together in Council accommodation. The list of problems is endless.
What can Baba do?
There is hope for him. He can make an application for ‘discretionary leave to remain’ in the UK. The case of Chikwamba (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) is relevant (see previous posts).
Baba can also make his own asylum and human rights claim and rely on Article 8 and the principles laid out in the above mentioned case. It’s not a hopeless situation, and it is advisable to obtain legal advice if facing such a situation.
Scenario No 2
Jack is a refugee in the UK. He was granted refugee status in 2009. Prior to this, he was a student. He had travelled between Zimbabwe and the UK when his visa was valid. During Jack’s travels, he had met Jill. They were in love and got married in South Africa in August 2009.
Jack tried to make an application for family reunion for his beloved Jill but his application was refused. He did not meet the requirements for family reunion as Jill was not his spouse prior to his fleeing persecution from Zimbabwe.
The requirements in brief are that only pre-existing families are eligible for family reunion i.e. the spouse, civil partner and minor children who formed part of the family unit previous to the time the sponsor fled to find asylum.
Other members of the family (e.g. elderly parents) may be allowed to come to the UK if there are compelling, compassionate situations. The parents and siblings of a minor who has been recognised as a refugee are not entitled to family reunion. Such applications are considered under the criteria above, that is there must be compelling, compassionate circumstances in order for the family to be granted entry to the UK.
Family reunion may be refused if family members fall within the terms of one of the exclusion clauses in the 1951 UN Convention, which states that an individual.
- Has not committed a crime against peace, a war crime or a crime against humanity;
- Has not committed a serious non-political crime;
- Has not been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
So is there anything Jack can do? There has been a recent decision in the Court of Appeal regarding a scenario similar to Jack and Jill’s. The Court of Appeal has left open the issue regarding refugees applying for their spouses whom they marry after getting refugee status.
A case, A (Afghanistan) which was heard in July was won by the asylum applicant. They did decide that it was a breach of family life, but that this might be justifiable.
Since 2005, refugees have been granted five years of limited leave, at the end of which they are eligible to apply for settlement, or ILR. Before 2005, they were granted settlement straight away, on the grounds that this policy promoted integration.
One of the consequences of this change is that refugees with limited leave are unable to sponsor a new spouse or other family members under the main immigration rules (rules 281, 297, 317 and so forth). There is provision for admission of a pre-existing spouse or child (i.e. a spouse to whom the refugee was married or a child born before the sponsor fled to the UK) but this cannot be used for a new, post-flight spouse
The Court accepted that this was interference in family life. However, the Home Office failed to comply with directions of the Court, and thus full argument was not heard on any balancing public policy reasons that the Home Office might have for making refugees wait.
The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal will now have to decide these issues in future cases and set an authority for such cases.
If an individual is facing such a situation, it is worth seeking legal advice.
Rumbidzai Bvunzawabaya is a Solicitor at RBM Solicitors based in Coventry. She can be contacted on e-mail info@rbmsolicitors.co.uk or telephone +442476520999
Disclaimer: This article only provides general information and guidance on immigration law.. The specific facts that apply to your matter may make the outcome different than would be anticipated by you. The writer will not accept any liability for any claims or inconvenience as a result of the use of this information
Pingback: auckland lighting
Pingback: Autoapprove Comment List
Pingback: ice maker machine
Pingback: Yeast Infection Cures
Pingback: show display
Pingback: Entry Level Mechanical Engineering Jobs
Pingback: rest homes tauranga
Pingback: generators direct
Pingback: http://adsenseapihelp.blogspot.com
Pingback: nz kitchen
Pingback: Download chart music
Pingback: Link Building Services
Pingback: fishing licence
Pingback: Download mp3 music
Pingback: side effects of hemp protein powder
Pingback: office install
Pingback: psychic readings
Pingback: forklift hire auckland
Pingback: Hampton Bay Solar Lights
Pingback: homes nz
Pingback: equipment rental
Pingback: Laboratory supplies
Pingback: Tube Ell Tube