Rumbidzai Bvunzawabaya

Rumbidzai Bvunzawabaya is a solicitor at RBM Solicitors, based in Coventry. She was admitted on the Roll of Solicitors for England and Wales in 2003 and admitted in Zimbabwe in 1998 as a Legal Practitioner

Applying for indefinite leave to remain in UK

THE UK Border Agency (UKBA) has released a statement to corporate partners asking that information should be relayed to community groups in a bid to ensure awareness regarding making an application for indefinite leave to remain (ILR) after the expiry of five years’ leave to remain as a refugee.

Prior to August 2005, refugees and those awarded humanitarian protection were granted indefinite leave to remain. But that system changed, and the Home Office started granting five years’ limited leave to remain.

The then Labour government announced in 2005 that at the end of their five years’ limited leave, subject to the outcome of any review and to the policies in place at the time, refugees would be eligible to seek indefinite leave to remain (ILR).

The first refugees (and those awarded humanitarian protection) to have been granted five years’ limited leave will reach the end of their leave from this month onwards.

Applying for further leave

The application should only be submitted in the month before the individual’s current leave expires.

Applications should be made using the form SET (Protection Route) which has been available for download via the UKBA website since July 2010.

It is in the interest of refugees and those with humanitarian protection to apply in time (i.e. before the expiry date of their leave) to ensure the speedy resolution of their case and the continuation of their leave.

The form has been designed with the applicant in mind and to be straightforward. The evidence and documents required for each application are listed on the form and further help is provided via the website.

There will be no fee payable when submitting an application for ILR on the settlement protection route.

It is recommended that the applicant retains a photocopy of their immigration status document before submitting the form and any associated documents by registered post. The applicant will receive an acknowledgement letter as proof of receipt.

Consideration of applications

All applications will be dealt with in the North West. Current service levels are 95% of applications cleared within six months, although the UKBA says it will strive to conclude applications earlier.

It will not normally be necessary for UKBA to conduct an in-depth review at this stage. However, in considering applications for ILR, the UKBA will check an applicant’s name against paragraph 339A of the Immigration Rules, which sets out the conditions under which a refugee’s leave might not be renewed or could be revoked.

These may include, for example, instances of an individual’s criminality, obtaining a national passport, voluntarily returning to the country of persecution or where circumstances come to light that indicate a person should not have been recognised as a refugee in the first place. Likewise, the UKBA will check whether those with humanitarian protection fall within paragraph 339G of the Immigration Rules.

Where there is evidence that an individual represents a danger to the UK, then the UKBA will take steps to revoke their status and start enforcement action.

They will also conduct more in-depth reviews where a refugee submits a late application, or has not applied for indefinite leave to remain at all. Again, these reviews may lead to consideration of revoking refugee status and enforcement action, where appropriate.

Once the application has been decided, the outcome will be sent via registered post, and, if successful, immigration status will be confirmed via a new status document. This will need to be kept safe, as it ensures access to services and mainstream benefits.

Exceptions

These arrangements do not affect those individuals who qualified for a grant of
discretionary leave following the consideration of their asylum claim. They should continue to apply for further discretionary leave or indefinite leave to remain, as appropriate, under the current rules using the same form as now, form HPDL.

Form HPDL can be found on the UKBA website [CLICK HERE]:

Please foreword this information to family and friends who may be affected to ensure that people do not overstay and breach their conditions of leave to remain.

Rumbidzai Bvunzawabaya is a Solicitor at RBM Solicitors based in Coventry. Visit website:http://www.rbmsolicitors.co.uk, e-mail info@rbmsolicitors.co.uk or call 02476520999

Disclaimer: This article only provides general information and guidance on immigration law. The specific facts that apply to your matter may make the outcome different than would be anticipated by you. The writer will not accept any liability for any claims or inconvenience as a result of the use of this information

  • Joanne

    Home Office bids to restrict jobs for asylum seekers

    Home Office ministers are trying to thwart the impact of a supreme court ruling lifting a work ban on 45,000 asylum seekers by severely restricting the jobs they can apply for…

    The immigration minister, Damian Green, wants to bar the asylum seekers from more than 28.5m jobs and restrict them to industries in which there are official staff shortages.

    Home Office officials are investigating the possibility of telling asylum seekers they can apply only for vacancies among 400,000 skilled jobs in shortage occupations – a tiny fraction of the jobs in the UK economy. Asylum seekers would have to be qualified maths teachers, chemical engineers, high-integrity pipe welders or even experienced orchestral musicians or ballet dancers to have any hope of being allowed to work. The conditions mirror the restrictions of the points-based immigration system which bans unskilled workers from outside of Europe from working in Britain.

    This week’s supreme court ruling said failed asylum seekers who made a second fresh claim for refugee status should be allowed to work if they had waited more than 12 months for a new Home Office decision.

    The ruling is in line with an EU directive that lays down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers across Europe to ensure a dignified standard of living. The supreme court rejected the home secretary’s argument that this group of asylum seekers should lose this protection because their initial application had been rejected.

    Refugee welfare groups have been fighting for more than 10 years to lift the ban on asylum seekers being allowed to work in Britain while their applications are decided. This is the first time the courts have backed the principle.

    Immigration barristers say the ruling will mean that tens of thousands of failed asylum seekers whose fresh applications are grinding their way through the system will be entitled to basic rights, including the right to work. The court said any problem with undeserving cases should be dealt with by resolving them promptly rather than by denying those involved their fundamental rights.

    The Home Office says that up to 45,000 failed asylum seekers are likely to be affected by the ruling. Many of them are among the 450,000 “legacy cases”, some dating back more than 10 years, which the Home Office is working through in a backlog exercise.

    Green confirmed his intention to severely restrict the jobs open to asylum seekers who have waited more than a year for a decision.

    He said: “I believe it is important to maintain a distinction between economic migration and asylum – giving failed asylum seekers access to the labour market undermines this principle.”

    He claimed the ruling would have only a short-term effect as “the long delays in the asylum system will be resolved by the summer of next year when all the older asylum cases are concluded”.

    Jonathan Ellis, director of policy and development at the Refugee Council, said the Home Office’s response to the ruling was “disappointing”.

    “The supreme court ruled that this group of asylum seekers has the right to work under EU law – the government should not then limit this right down to a small number of asylum seekers who meet the requirements for national shortage occupations.

    “The shortage occupation list is not designed for asylum seekers but rather economic migrants needing sponsorship to come to the UK. Asylum seekers who have waited so long for a decision should be allowed to work for local employers whenever their skills are needed.”

  • Joanne

    Home Office bids to restrict jobs for asylum seekers

    Home Office ministers are trying to thwart the impact of a supreme court ruling lifting a work ban on 45,000 asylum seekers by severely restricting the jobs they can apply for…

    The immigration minister, Damian Green, wants to bar the asylum seekers from more than 28.5m jobs and restrict them to industries in which there are official staff shortages.

    Home Office officials are investigating the possibility of telling asylum seekers they can apply only for vacancies among 400,000 skilled jobs in shortage occupations – a tiny fraction of the jobs in the UK economy. Asylum seekers would have to be qualified maths teachers, chemical engineers, high-integrity pipe welders or even experienced orchestral musicians or ballet dancers to have any hope of being allowed to work. The conditions mirror the restrictions of the points-based immigration system which bans unskilled workers from outside of Europe from working in Britain.

    This week’s supreme court ruling said failed asylum seekers who made a second fresh claim for refugee status should be allowed to work if they had waited more than 12 months for a new Home Office decision.

    The ruling is in line with an EU directive that lays down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers across Europe to ensure a dignified standard of living. The supreme court rejected the home secretary’s argument that this group of asylum seekers should lose this protection because their initial application had been rejected.

    Refugee welfare groups have been fighting for more than 10 years to lift the ban on asylum seekers being allowed to work in Britain while their applications are decided. This is the first time the courts have backed the principle.

    Immigration barristers say the ruling will mean that tens of thousands of failed asylum seekers whose fresh applications are grinding their way through the system will be entitled to basic rights, including the right to work. The court said any problem with undeserving cases should be dealt with by resolving them promptly rather than by denying those involved their fundamental rights.

    The Home Office says that up to 45,000 failed asylum seekers are likely to be affected by the ruling. Many of them are among the 450,000 “legacy cases”, some dating back more than 10 years, which the Home Office is working through in a backlog exercise.

    Green confirmed his intention to severely restrict the jobs open to asylum seekers who have waited more than a year for a decision.

    He said: “I believe it is important to maintain a distinction between economic migration and asylum – giving failed asylum seekers access to the labour market undermines this principle.”

    He claimed the ruling would have only a short-term effect as “the long delays in the asylum system will be resolved by the summer of next year when all the older asylum cases are concluded”.

    Jonathan Ellis, director of policy and development at the Refugee Council, said the Home Office’s response to the ruling was “disappointing”.

    “The supreme court ruled that this group of asylum seekers has the right to work under EU law – the government should not then limit this right down to a small number of asylum seekers who meet the requirements for national shortage occupations.

    “The shortage occupation list is not designed for asylum seekers but rather economic migrants needing sponsorship to come to the UK. Asylum seekers who have waited so long for a decision should be allowed to work for local employers whenever their skills are needed.”

  • Gabriel Mhaka

    The article and the latest UKBA guidelines do not fully explain the 5 year concept before applying for ILR. Assuming a person sought asylum and waited 4 years for the positive result,i.e grant of a 5 year refugee status, does this person wait yet another 5 years before applying for ILR? Do the years spent as an asylum seeker count?

  • Gabriel Mhaka

    The article and the latest UKBA guidelines do not fully explain the 5 year concept before applying for ILR. Assuming a person sought asylum and waited 4 years for the positive result,i.e grant of a 5 year refugee status, does this person wait yet another 5 years before applying for ILR? Do the years spent as an asylum seeker count?

  • Joanne

    Gabriel they obviously do not count . It is just the 5 years from the grant of status

  • Joanne

    Gabriel they obviously do not count . It is just the 5 years from the grant of status

  • Pingback: 5 years leave to remain « Zimbabwe Association

  • Pingback: how make a website

  • Pingback: psychic readings for free

  • Pingback: Recurrent Yeast Infections

  • Pingback: {Legalsounds|Download music}

  • Pingback: Tour 2012

  • Pingback: Entry Level Mechanical Engineering Jobs

  • Pingback: Angry Bird Online

  • Pingback: nz kitchen

  • Pingback: show display

  • Pingback: rest homes

  • Pingback: new zealand advertising

  • Pingback: Gold Rate in Dubai

  • Pingback: Download chart music

  • Pingback: homes nz

  • Pingback: psychic

  • Pingback: screen doors nz

  • Pingback: how to service a car

  • Pingback: true nutrition

  • Pingback: auckland accommodation

  • Pingback: White Solar Lights

  • Pingback: fishing licence

  • Pingback: Lab supplies

  • Pingback: funny sms

  • Pingback: Singapore Web Design

  • Pingback: acid reflux symptoms

  • Pingback: icdc college

  • Pingback: Bernard Village condos Newport News VA for Sale

  • Pingback: darmo seks

  • Pingback: cat scan vs mri

  • Pingback: true nutrition discount code

  • Pingback: true nutrition

  • Pingback: true nutrition discount code

  • Pingback: CherryBids

  • Pingback: Scholarships For Minorities Hamilton Square

  • Pingback: new york attorney matt couloute

  • Pingback: Buy Cisco