3 September 2010
 
New Zimbabwe Header
Parliament goes digital
Zimbabwe welcome 'incredible': Akon
SA to resume Zim deportations
Harare stands still as Akon sweeps into town
MORE NEWS
Engen to expand Zim operations
Fiscal situation remains constrained: Biti
MORE BUSINESS
Makosi: Boobs are just fat
The Truth About: Tinashe
MORE SHOWBIZ
Moses Chunga makes winning start
Liberia suspends three players
MORE SPORTS
On the heroism of Gibson Sibanda
A new take on devolution
MORE OPINION
 
Limiting human risk through Constitution
A village that laughed at progress
MORE COLUMNISTS
OUTsurance
 

Sanctions not a factor in Zim's access to loans: US

26/02/2010 00:00:00
by
E mail this to a friend Printable Version
 
Push ... Finance Minister Tendai Biti has asked the US to lift sanctions on banks
 
RELATED STORIES

A DIPLOMAT at the American Embassy in Harare says U.S. sanctions are not a factor in Zimbabwe’s relations with multi-lateral lenders such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank.

“There never has been any connection between U.S. sanctions and Zimbabwe's  relationship with the IMF,” James Garry, Economic Officer at the U.S. Embassy, told journalists at a roundtable discussion on Wednesday.

Garry explained that even if the Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act (ZDERA) was to be repealed today, Zimbabwe would still not be able to access loans because of its arrears with the multi-lateral lenders.  Arrears made Zimbabwe ineligible for loans even before ZDERA became law in December 2001.

“There is a widespread misapprehension that the U.S. has some kind of veto at the IMF. It is not true. The IMF, for example, makes most of its decisions by majority vote, and voting strength is assigned essentially according to the country’s financial interest in the Fund. The U.S. has just 16.77 percent of the voting power at the IMF, and it is not in a position to veto IMF decisions,” said Garry.

On February 19, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund announced its decision to restore Zimbabwe’s voting and related rights, and its eligibility to use resources from the IMF’s General Resources Account (GRA), following a request from Zimbabwe’s Finance Minister Tendai Biti.

Notwithstanding the restoration of the eligibility to use GRA resources, said the IMF, Zimbabwe will not be able to use resources from the GRA or the Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust (PRGT) until it fully settles its arrears of about US$140 million.

Garry said the restoration of Zimbabwe’s IMF voting rights announced by the IMF last week opens the door to closer cooperation with the IMF, noting that Zimbabwe must take further steps before it can borrow again from the IMF. He said Zimbabwe’s arrears with other multilateral lenders such as the African Development Bank and the World Bank also need to be addressed.



Advertisement

The US imposed sanctions in 2001 "to provide for a transition to democracy and to promote economic recovery in Zimbabwe". Apart from banning trade with certain Zimbabwean companies, including banks, the sanctions impose a travel ban and assets freeze on President Robert Mugabe and dozens of senior government officials.

Further, the sanctions regime directs United States citizens sitting on the boards of international financial institutions to vote against "any extension by the respective institution of any loan, credit, or guarantee to the government of Zimbabwe" and to opposes "any cancellation or reduction of indebtedness owed by the government of Zimbabwe to the United States or any international financial institution."


 
Email this to a friend Printable Version Discuss This Story
 
Share this article:

Digg it

Del.icio.us

Reddit

Newsvine

Nowpublic

Stumbleupon

Face Book

Myspace

Fark
 
 
 


 Readers Comments
   
Sir; Sanctions against Zimbabwe direct US executive directors on the Boards of the IMF and the World Bank to vote against loans/credits to Zimbabwe.However loans could still be approved if the US was alone in its opposition. The real pressing hurdle is the clearance of arrears to the IMF, the World Bank and the the African Development Bank which are large.Zimbabwe is unlikely to mobilise such amounts without bilateral support from some of the old donors (Europe, Japan, Canada etc) and the emerging donors(China etc). I have also followed the sterile debate regarding HIPC.The facts remain that Zimbabwe is highly indebted whether Mugabe likes it or not.These debts were incurred during ZANU/PF' watch.Now why would the country want to use its rsources to service debt instead getting subtantial relief/cancellation and therefore freing up money for investment in its development programes.Many African countries have reaped huge benefits from the HIPC as would Zimbabwe.
 
Enias C Madavo, Wash. DC USA

Comment Date: 26 February 2010


I am so tired of the Zimbabwean govt and Zanu PF blaming all the ills of the country on sanctions. I have heard them so many times say " we can do it by ourselves" why do you keep blaming other people then? If they had people at heart they would just do whats best for the country despite the sanctions. I am really tired of this bullshit!!
 
Johnny B. Goode, Wilmington DE

Comment Date: 26 February 2010


Generate money from the sources you have, why loans Zanu is stealing the country yblind but still think buyions suits and is the priority.
 
Matu,zvi Adona, Afghanistan

Comment Date: 26 February 2010


 
Full Name
Email Address: (Will Not Be Shown)
Town & Country
Phone number (optional):
Comment
You have 1000  characters left.

  Remember me - this will save you having to type out your name, location and       email address when you next leave a comment.
 
 
 
RSS NewsTicker