13 February 2012
 
New Zimbabwe Header
Minister: Zim risks losing power imports
Zanu PF escalates constitution row
SA bank notes to feature Mandela
Diamond firm gets KP clearance
MORE NEWS
Zimplats warns over local uncertainties
Indigenous banks: patriotism versus safety
MORE BUSINESS
MoneyGram UK sponsors Zim awards
I'm ok, says 'deported' Makosi
MORE SHOWBIZ
Zimbabwe Cricket response to Coltart
Zambia crowned African Champions
MORE SPORTS
Elections: EU's cue to extend sanctions
Councils crisis: MDC-T defends record
MORE OPINION
MORE COLUMNISTS
 

Blair 'would have loved' to topple Mugabe


Sworn enemies ... Blair and Mugabe met at the Commonwealth Summit in Scotland in 1997

01/09/2010 00:00:00
by Mduduzi Mathuthu
 
Regime change ... Blair says he considered plan to topple Mugabe
 
RELATED STORIES
Strip-tease envoy says never recalled
Tsvangirai anger over Dell criticism
Mugabe to ICC: Arrest Blair, Bush
Wikileaks to release Zim dossier
Wikileaks: Ncube claims US murder plot
Leak reveals US doubts about PM
Strip-tease envoy ordered back
Biti considers embassy cuts
Give Mugabe UK home: ex-minister
Tsvangirai suffers EU, UN envoys snub
UN rejects PM’s envoy plea
EU 'concern' over envoys row
PM disowns envoys in letters to UN
Zim soldier, cop held in Botswana
Interview: Mugabe on health, EU-US relations
Blair secretly courted Mugabe: papers
SA embassy staffer injured in attack
Diplomats slammed for Mugabe walk-out

FORMER British Prime Minister Tony Blair admits he “would have loved” to topple President Robert Mugabe militarily, but found the task “impractical” because he enjoys a “lingering support” from fellow African leaders.

The disclosure is made in Blair’s autobiography, A Journey, which was published this week.

Blair, who stood down as Prime Minister in June 2007 after a decade in power, writes: "People often used to say to me: If you got rid of the gangsters in Sierra Leone, [Slobodan] Milošević, the Taliban and Saddam, why can't you get rid of Mugabe?

“The answer is I would have loved to, but it wasn't practical (since, in his case, and for reasons I never quite understood, the surrounding African nations maintained a lingering support for him and would have opposed any action strenuously)."

Seeking to systematise his theory of foreign interventions in regimes that are "oppressive or dictatorial", he adds: "They may pose no outside or external threat; or it may be easily contained diplomatically. It may – as with Mugabe – be impractical to intervene."

A judgment has to be made, he states. "If change will not come by evolution, should it be done by revolution? Should those who have the military power contemplate doing so?

“The leader has to decide whether the objective is worth the cost. What's more, he or she must do so unsure of what the exact cost might be or the exact price of failing to meet the objective ... In this context, by the way, indecision is also decision ... Omission and commission both have consequences.”

Blair’s latest comments will be seized on by President Robert Mugabe who has previously claimed the existence of an Anglo-American alliance to carry out “regime change” in Zimbabwe. Mugabe says the plot has assumed the form of economic sabotage, namely sanctions imposed on the country following his government’s move since 2000 to seize white commercial farmland for resettling landless blacks.

British and American officials however deny a plot to oust Mugabe, insisting instead that sanctions were imposed in response to his government’s human rights violations; the targeted killing of political opponents and electoral theft.



Advertisement


 
Email this to a friend Printable Version Discuss This Story
 
Share this article:

Digg it

Del.icio.us

Reddit

Newsvine

Nowpublic

Stumbleupon

Face Book

Myspace

Fark
 
 
 
 
 
RSS NewsTicker