23 May 2012
 
New Zimbabwe Header
PM draws fire over China delegation size
No vacancy for Zanu PF leader: Gumbo
UN envoy gets Mugabe history lesson
Chitungwiza councillor 'sold 388 stands'
MORE NEWS
Mimosa loses 75,000t ore to mine fire
Mpofu, Ncube meet over ZISCO chaos
MORE BUSINESS
'Unpatriotic' Roki gets axe warning
Roki and Maneta: how 'stuff hit the fan'
MORE SHOWBIZ
H'landers stretch lead as Dynamos held
Frimpong joins great trek to Harare
MORE SPORTS
Why Zuma's Spear should stay up
Zuma painting an attack on blacks
MORE OPINION
 
Facebook: reward for innovation
MORE COLUMNISTS
 

Supreme Court to decide Speaker challenge

19/09/2010 00:00:00
by Staff Reporter
 
Challenged ... Lovemore Moyo
 
RELATED STORIES
CDF: MP held, more arrests expected
MPs face prosecution for fraud
Biti rejects MPs' car demands
Minister fined for chief assault
PM orders senators to reconvene
Furious MPs threaten to block budget
Court quashes MDC MP's jail term
MPs 'can’t use internet'
The all new Zim parliament
MPs want new cars every year
Parliament goes digital
MP's teenage 'wife' kills self

ZIMBABWE’S entire Supreme Court bench will on Tuesday sit to consider an appeal by Tsholotsho North Member of Parliament Professor Jonathan Moyo [Zanu PF] which seeks to nullify the election of MDC-T Chairman Lovemore Moyo as Speaker of the House of Assembly.

The full bench comprising Chief Justice Godfrey Chidyausiku, his deputy, Luke Malaba, as well as Justices Wilson Sandura; Vernada Ziyambi and Paddington Garwe only sits when handling a constitutional case.

Professor Moyo appealed to the Supreme Court after his case was dismissed by High Court judge Bharat Patel in March.

The Zanu PF legislator alleges that there were gross constitutional violations in the poll for Speaker which was conducted on August 25, 2008.

He said the High Court found that some MDC-T legislators openly displayed their votes, deviating the process from the secret ballot system.

“However, during the election process there were several deviations from the procedure prescribed as appears from the papers and exhibits filed herein,” the heads of argument read.

Moyo further claims that the election was disorderly resulting in Zvoma “helplessly throwing his hands in the air and abdicating his duties of conducting the election”.

This, Prof Moyo argues, led to the election being held without the supervision of the Clerk of Parliament in accordance with the Constitution, which imposes the obligation of conducting the election of Speaker on the Clerk.

“It is submitted that it was an express term of the law that the first respondent (Zvoma) is to conduct such an election.

“However, in breach of this and as was clearly found by the court, (Zvoma) for reasons best known to himself either lost control of proceedings or refused to stamp his authority on them,” Moyo argues.



Advertisement


 
Email this to a friend Printable Version Discuss This Story
 
Share this article:

Digg it

Del.icio.us

Reddit

Newsvine

Nowpublic

Stumbleupon

Face Book

Myspace

Fark
 
 
 
 
 
RSS NewsTicker