22 October 2017
   
BREAKING: WHO revokes Mugabe offer
WHO: Moyo seethes as Mugabe shamed
Mugabe UN honour offensive; Irish min
Gukurahundi event: cops block Dabengwa
PRC: No contest, Mujuru our automatic boss
Mthwakazi: Zim men target our women
Biti: Govt worsening Zim high risk profile
Gweru heeds Mugabe order, clears vendors
MORE NEWS
EU to Zim: Speed up economic reforms
Zim currency crisis: When the market rules
MORE BUSINESS
Mr Ugly is back! 13 up for 2017 gong
EU Film Festival comes to Bulawayo
MORE SHOWBIZ
Huddersfield hand Man U first defeat
Premiership takes Chibuku break
MORE SPORTS
Zimbabwe is Africa’s shakedown state
Napping dictator no Mandela match
MORE OPINION
 
Sunday Roast: Brave, heroic diarrhoea!
Clerics! Please plead the cause of the poor
MORE COLUMNISTS
 
 
Mugabe’s reckless remarks undermine judiciary: PDP
16/02/2017 00:00:00
by Staff Reporter
 
 
RELATED STORIES

THE opposition People’s Democratic Party has condemned President Robert Mugabe for setting a precedent that further derogates Zimbabwe’s status as a constitutional democracy.

The Tendai Biti-led party said Mugabe’s resentment of the judgement by High Court Judge Priscilla Chigumba which protected citizens’ political rights the during mass protects of last year, revitalized fear in the profession.

According to the opposition party, the fear manifested itself when five Supreme Court judges recused themselves from the contentious challenge on the appointment of the country’s new Chief Justice set to take-over from Godfrey Chidyausiku who retires this month.

“President Mugabe set a bad precedent when he recklessly attacked a serving judge in violation of Section 164 of the supreme law which specifies that the courts are independent and subject only to the constitution and the law which must be applied without fear or favour,” the party said on Monday.

“Section 44 obligates everyone, including the state, to respect and promote the rights of the Zimbabwean people as defined in the Bill of rights, the Judge was simply observing the same, instead of being cursed she was supposed to be applauded.

“At the present moment public expectation is not met when all the serving judges are no longer able to impartially and fearlessly discharge their constitutional duties up to a level where a retired judge has to be roped in just to make a quorum.”

After, the court ruled against the executive, cabinet has since proposed amendments to the 2013 constitution to allow Mugabe, instead of the Judiciary Services Commission through publicly held interviews, to appoint the Chief Justice

PDP said Mugabe’s regime must separate constitutionalism from party political bickering and infighting.

“Such a top post is at the centre of protecting the supreme law of the land therefore appointment must be on merit.

“It is an indictment on the part of the Zanu PF leadership whose unrepentant conflation of the state with their evil party continue endanger the existence of a constitutional democracy.”



Advertisement


 
Email this to a friend Printable Version Discuss This Story
Share this article:

Digg it

Del.icio.us

Reddit

Newsvine

Nowpublic

Stumbleupon

Face Book

Myspace

Fark

 
 
 
comments powered by Disqus
 
RSS NewsTicker