|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| IMMIGRATION
AND ASYLUM |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Reaction to Court of Appeal judgment in AA The following is a reaction by the Refugee Legal Centre to the Court of Appeal judgment in the case of AA v Secretary of State for the Home Department delivered on March 6, 2007: "THE Refugee Legal Centre welcomes the Court of Appeal decision to order the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal to reconsider whether Zimbabweans who have claimed asylum in the UK are at risk of human rights abuse if returned to Zimbabwe. The Court of Appeal considered that the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal had failed to properly scrutinise the evidence in the case. That evidence showed that failed asylum seekers risked being subjected to serious violence by agents of the Zimbabwean Government's Central Intelligence Organisation stationed at Harare airport. Thea Rogers, Deputy Chief Executive of the Refugee Legal Centre, said: "We are delighted that
the Court of Appeal considers that this test case must The Government has put a great deal of time, money and effort into defending this test case, but in our view the evidence reveals a risk that Zimbabweans who exercise their right to claim asylum in the UK are at risk of serious violence if returned to Harare Airport.
The Government should
not just maintain its ban on forcibly removing Zimbabweans asylum seekers
from the UK to Harare Airport, but should also grant them protection
in the UK until the situation in Zimbabwe improves, allowing them to
work and support themselves." |
|||||||||||||||||
|
All material copyright newzimbabwe.com Material may be published or reproduced in any form with appropriate credit to this website |
|||||||||||||||||