UK tells Zimbabwe asylum seeker: 'It's your fault you were persecuted'

UK tells Zimbabwe asylum seeker: 'It's your fault you were persecuted'

• Britain accused of 'savage brutality' over Zim deportations

• Zimbabwe says UK deportees 'mercenaries of regime change'

• Zim families qualify for UK amnesty

• Britain urged to halt deportations

• UK protests planned over deportations

• Neighbour's eye witness account as UK deports Zim mum

• Britain deports Zimbabwe mum and kids

• UK condemned over deportation of Zim asylum seekers

• UK resumes deportation of Zimbabweans

• Britain plugs Zimbabwe visa loophole

• Britain still a magnet for Zimbabweans

• Zim immigrants account for half of Aids cases in UK

• Deported for falling out of love

• Britain's asylum shame

• Britain clamps down on C'nwealth job scheme

• Britain clamps down on sham marriages

• 6 years for hit-and-run Zim refugee

• Zanu PF UK asylum network exposed

• Police shed more light on visa scam

• Zim man nabbed in visa scam

By Jenifer Johnston and John Paul Breslin

BRITISH immigration officials told an asylum seeker from Zimbabwe that he had only himself to blame for threats against his life because he had been foolish enough to protest against Robert Mugabe’s regime!

The Home Office last night admitted the officials had acted ‘‘inappropriately’’ and promised an investigation.

The asylum seeker – who wishes to remain anonymous – received a letter written by a Home Office civil servant in September, explaining why he could not stay in the UK.

The letter acknowledged that Robert Mugabe’s Zanu-PF party “indiscriminately rape, torture and murder people perceived to oppose their beliefs …’’ It added: ‘‘Zanu-PF routinely com mits atrocities with ease and without the threat of repercussions,” but went on to blame the refugee for having to flee the country because he had been “foolhardy enough” to oppose the regime, which has been condemned by governments around the world.

The letter also said: “Serious reservations are expressed in relation to the truthfulness of your account. Although their violent actions are not condoned, their motives are understandable in as much as you would have been seen to ridicule them [Zanu-PF], which as the ruling party would not be acceptable.”

The Home Office has now promised to review the case, saying the letter was “certainly not representative of either the Home Office position or the quality standards expected.”

An official from the Foreign Office, which has been involved in intricate and delicate negotiations with Zimbabwe through the EU, told the Sunday Herald he found the letter “appalling.”

The refugee is understood to have fled Zimbabwe after supporting the MDC opposition party, and is seeking asylum in the UK as he fears for his life if he is repatriated. The Home Office rejects 90% of initial applications, although almost one-fifth of those succeed on appeal.

The letter came to light as part of a dossier of “bizarre” refusal letters, sent by the Home Office to asylum seekers, which was compiled by the Immigration Advisory Service (IAS), the UK’s largest advocacy group for refugees.

Chris Yeo of the IAS told the Sunday Herald: “We are app alled by the reasoning used to refuse asylum in these cases.

“In recent months we have noticed a definite falling-off in the standards of refusal letters, with Home Office caseworkers using very odd reasoning to stop asylum claims, clearly in some cases working from out-of-date information,” he said.

Yeo claimed the Home Office has several serious problems in the way it handles complex cases.

“The case workers are among the lowest-paid civil servants in Europe,” he said, “and there is a desperate need for the Home Office to employ staff with specialised knowledge to handle these claims better.”

Sally Daghlian, director of the Scottish Refugee Council, said: “All agencies are very concerned about Home Office decision-making, and letters like this are sadly fairly typical.

“Where there is a risk of someone being returned to a country like Zimbabwe to face persecution, there must be a far higher duty of care.”

Tony Hughes, a solicitor with the Scottish IAS, said he was concerned with the quality of the Home Office responses.

“As far as I am aware,” he said, “these civil servants work from a template, cutting and pasting information, and [the letters] do not always seem to be written by someone familiar with the law. Workers without proper training are refusing applications while unaware of the issues in the country of origin.”

Home Office officials use information from an internal body, the Country Information and Policy Unit (CIPU), to make decisions about asylum cases. In February Amnesty International severely criticised the CIPU for using out-of-date information in their reports, and the Home Office for “unreasonable, failing decision making.”

An Amnesty spokesman said: “Getting an asylum decision wrong is not like a clerical error on a tax bill or parking fine ... These are life-or-death decisions and the Home Office is getting one in five of them wrong.” - Sunday Herald
Have you received a bizarre refusal letter from the Home Office? If so, we would like to hear from you. Please call on 02920315905 or e-mail us on the address provided at the foot of the page
JOIN THE DEBATE ON THIS ARTICLE ON THE NEWZIMBABWE.COM FORUMS
newsdesk@newzimbabwe.com