The best Zimbabwe news site on the world wide web 
NEWS
FORUMS
NEWS ANALYSIS
READERS' FORUM

CARTOON

BRITISH FOREIGN OFFICE

IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM: COMMENT

Betrayed by Blair, they will simply go underground


Full text of AIT judgment on deportations

Britain can deport Zim asylum seekers

The Home Office v Zim asylum seekers

Asylum tribunal hears evidence from ex-CIO men

UK asylum court battle set for July

PART I..Tanya, cutting through a web of lies

PART II..Tanya, cutting through a web of lies

PART III..Tanya, cutting through a web of lies

PART IV..Tanya, cutting through a web of lies

Tanya seeks gag order to hide 'dark past'

Zim asylum seekers double after UK ruling

UK minister loses job over sex-for-asylum scandal

'Sex for asylum' UK officer suspended

'I will help you,' he said. Then he asked for sex

Mugabe in 'come home' plea to exiles

Home Office wins key Zim asylum ruling

Decision will impact on all Zim asylum seekers

UK sham marriages law struck down

Voice of New Zimbawe.com

AFTER a spirited legal battle, failed Zimbabwean asylum-seekers now face the dreaded prospect of deportation.

The decision by the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal dealt a cruel blow to hundreds of Zimbabweans who had lived in limbo but still harboured the hope that common sense would ultimately prevail.

The paradox of this ruling remains perplexing as it is disturbing. On the one hand, the British government has condemned President Robert Mugabe as a vile dictator persecuting his own people.

Yet on the other, Zimbabwe is deemed safe country for people who have dared claim asylum, people Mugabe himself has branded in scornful terms as low-grade sell-outs, peddling falsehoods for undeserved sanctuary.

The decision came at a rather unfortunate time. It has coincided with the unfavourable agenda of new Home Secretary, John Reid. Since his recent appointment, he has proved hell-bent to supersede his predecessors in implementing the most ruthless and draconian methods against asylum-seekers after branding the Home Office 'not fit for purpose'.

While his grand plan is designed against all asylum-seekers, the AIT judgment has presented him a timely opportunity to exercise a brutal assault on Zimbabweans to please a disgruntled opposition. Our people will now be used a cannon fodder.

Already, his ministers are talking about removals starting by the end of the month.

The ruling leaves our failed asylum-seekers in a real quandary, if not panic. Should they comply with this ruling, be rounded up as sitting ducks, bundled onto planes or go underground?

The latter looks an attractive option. Zimbabweans feel hard done-by. They have, and sincerely so, pursued a protracted legal route in the belief that the British government position on asylum seekers would conform to their critical stance against the Mugabe regime. Today they ask: where is the rationale?

Only yesterday, the British government was condemning Operation Murambatsvina in terms fit for a brutal dictator that Mugabe is. The human rights situation in Zimbabwe has not changed. The Central Intelligence Organisation continues to monitor arrivals from UK with a hawkish eye.

It is for these reasons that going under will prove a persuasive option. By hopping onto the 'underground train', affected Zimbabweans believe they can at least buy some time away from the madding regime.
JOIN THE DEBATE ON THIS ARTICLE ON THE NEWZIMBABWE.COM FORUMS

newsdesk@newzimbabwe.com


All material copyright newzimbabwe.com
Material may be published or reproduced in any form with appropriate credit to this website