|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| IMMIGRATION
AND ASYLUM |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Zimbabwe asylum test case hearing opens By Staff
Reporter
The hearing at Field House in London, was expected to last at least three days. The AIT decided two months ago to drop another case known as AA – the initials of the asylum claimant – as a test case for Zimbabwe following marathon appeals and counter-appeals. Immigration experts believe recent political developments in Zimbabwe, including a failed coup plot, could see the court increase the scope of people who deserve protection to cover those with a background in the security services. The change from AA to HS, lawyers said, was aimed at “dealing fully with recent developments in Zimbabwe”. Sonal Ghelani of the Refugee Legal Centre, representing HS, said: “The (HS) appeal will deal with refugee status and consider risk of ill-treatment and humanitarian conditions and what deterioration has occurred since last summer.” The legal team for HS is as it was for AA . Mark Henderson at Doughty Street Chambers is counsel. The RLC said a determination on AA, which has been to the Court of Appeal twice and is now going back to the AIT for a third time, was now likely to be influenced by the decision the Tribunal reaches on HS. Both HS and AA are Zimbabwean asylum seekers who are only known by their initials, and cannot be identified. Sarah Harland of the Zimbabwe Association in London told The New Zimbabwe that they remained hopeful deportations to Zimbabwe would be halted in response to the deteriorating human rights situation in the country. “The positive side of the decision to use a different case from AA is that it may be quicker to resolve. With AA already on third attempt, who is to know if there will be AA4 or AA5?” Tribunal judges will be persuaded by HS’ lawyers to declare Zimbabwe an unsafe destination to deport failed asylum seekers. Harland said: “The Tribunal will be assessing the present state of the situation. They will look at people who returned voluntarily, and forced returns to see if they are at any risk of ill treatment. “The situation in Zimbabwe is so volatile at the moment that it could have deteriorated in the next month or two, or on the other hand there could be a miraculous recovery, if you are the optimistic type. So the Tribunal will be making an assessment of all those factors.” Human rights groups and asylum campaigners in the UK say asylum seekers returned to Zimbabwe face harassment and possible torture by state security agents who see them as “British agents of regime change”. The Zimbabwe Association says 16 145 Zimbabweans applied for asylum in the United Kingdom between 2000 and 2004. A majority of the claims remain unresolved or have been dismissed. The Association
says 1 010 Zimbabweans claimed asylum in 2000, a further 2 115 in 2001,
some 7 695 claims in 2002, 3 280 claims in 2003 and 2 045 we made in
2004. |
|||||||||||||||||
|
All material copyright newzimbabwe.com Material may be published or reproduced in any form with appropriate credit to this website |
|||||||||||||||||