|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| LETTER
FROM KUTAMA: MTHULISI MATHUTHU |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Just what is the meaning of change? 01/08/03 It is
easy to imagine that the word change has a collective meaning and that
that change is just beyond President Robert Mugabe’s rule. How
wrong. What doesn’t occur to many is that while the word change
is scaring to the ruling elite and their hangers-on its meaning is different
even amongst its proponents. To an MDC member in Kezi-Maphisa change is most likely to mean a new dispensation under which power and the national patrimony are shared equally amongst the majority and the minority while to its Harare supporter it might mean the removal of Mugabe from power and the ushering in of a new era under which people will not que for petrol and bread. To the
latter it might simply mean a change of characters in the power game
and not a change of political culture which nurses intolerance, gullibility
and violence. Welshman Ncube’s idea of change is obviously different
from that of Morgan Tsvangirai for the simple reason that their memories,
fears and hopes are hardly the same. Even Zanu PF treats them differently
mindful of differences in their idea of a better future.
Ncube on the other hand could be hoping for a future which is free from untrammeled power and praise singing. A future which ties all its hopes on the rule of law the power of diversity. To him Mugabe can be a major factor only in as far as he has become a powerful tyrant who has penetrated every facet of life. Otherwise he is just another man whose removal alone will not guarantee a change of a political culture which Mugabe’s rule has inculcated since 1980. To the Zimbabwe Union of Journalists change might mean the scrapping of Posa, Aippa and Jonathan Moyo’s redundancy while to the white people it might mean the return of the farms in a post Mugabe era. Now what does this teach us? It is a warning that if people refuse to acknowledge their different understanding of the word change we are likely to have a situation in which the future will reify Tsvangirai and his people and leave outside all those who were working against Mugabe outside. Just as the current establishment has tried to idolise those who fought in the liberation war as the only heroes we might as well other Hunzvis and Chinotimbas. Once again those who are against Mugabe but are not behind the future leader will be branded as sell-outs, Mugabe’s puppets and so on. The sad result will be a vicious circle. Rather than downplay the differences between our hopes, fears and ideas it will be in our interest to find a common platform on which we will celebrate our differences. Let David
Coltart, Roy Bennet, Ncube, Tsvangirai and Job Sikhala’s ideas
of change be known and be acknowledged so we can strike a common understanding
- thuthuma@yahoo.com |
|||||||||||||||||
| All material copyright newzimbabwe.com Material may be published or reproduced in any form with appropriate credit to this website |
|||||||||||||||||