Zimbabwe given net censorship all-clear

Zimbabwe given net censorship all-clear

FEW people have access to the internet in Zimbabwe

• Zimbabwe uses net to hit back at critics

• ISPs revolt over TelOne rates

• Internet service restored after TelOne pays up

• TelOne debt triggers internet chaos in Zimbabwe

• Outrage as army chiefs back snooping Bill

• Parliamentary committee pores over snooping Bill

• Zim unveils phone, e-mail snooping Bill

• Zim promises law on cyber crime

• New law will allow phone, e-mail spying

• Mugabe wants US to shed internet control

• Mugabe speech: internet governance not a US preserve

• Hackers break into government website

• Mugabe's spies monitoring your calls, mail

• MDC claims government intercepting e-mails

• Alcatel deploys in Zimbabwe

• What Mugabe can and cannot do with your e-mails

• MWeb 'will obey' e-mail snooping laws

• Mugabe plays Big Brother on the internet

• Supreme Court bans e-mail snooping

• Mugabe wants to read your e-mails

By Staff Reporter

ZIMBABWE has been given the all clear in a survey of countries which censor the internet.

OpenNet Initiative (ONI), which is made up of groups at Cambridge University, Harvard Law School, Oxford University and the University of Toronto found that 25 of the 41 governments studied block or filter internet content.

This compares to just a few countries filtering content five years ago, said the researchers.

Topping the list in the survey was Azerbaijan, followed by Bahrain. China was fourth, while Ethiopia made an entry on fifth -- the highest positioned African country in the list of 25 which also includes Libya, Morocco, Sudan and Tunisia.

The governments are not just blocking websites but also services and applications such as Google Maps or Skype, the survey revealed.

On Zimbabwe, the researchers said: "Despite the country's highly repressive regime, ONI found no evidence of Web site filtration in Zimbabwe. Limited Internet access and e-mail-focused usage have centered the country's efforts to control the internet toward regulating email."

John Palfrey, professor of law at Harvard Law School, said in a statement: "Some regulation is to be expected as the medium matures but filtering and surveillance can seriously erode civil liberties and privacy and stifle global communications."

The top reasons for filtering are politics (blocking of opposition parties' sites); social norms (blocking activities such as pornography or gambling) and national security concerns (blocking radical groups' sites).

Countries take very different approaches. For instance China, Iran and Saudi Arabia filter content on a wide range of topics, while South Korea filters only one topic - North Korea - but does that extensively.

Iran is the one country listed as blocking across all three areas: politics, social issues and national security topics.

No evidence of filtering was found in 14 countries, including Afghanistan, Egypt, Iraq, Israel, West Bank and Gaza, Malaysia, Nepal, Venezuela and Zimbabwe, the researchers said.

The researchers chose to study countries whose state online surveillance practices were largely unknown. Because of this, a number of countries in Europe and North America were not included.

It can be hard to compare these Western countries with those surveyed given that web control in the West tends to be done by the private rather than the public sector, the researchers said.

In future, the ONI hopes to expand the scope of the research to include internet cafés and mobile content - and expects to find more evidence of net censorship in later studies.
JOIN THE DEBATE ON THIS ARTICLE ON THE NEWZIMBABWE.COM FORUMS
newsdesk@newzimbabwe.com