The best Zimbabwe news site on the world wide web 
NEWS
FORUMS
NEWS ANALYSIS
READERS' FORUM

CARTOON

BRITISH FOREIGN OFFICE

TAFFY NYAWANZA: YOU AND THE LAW

Term time employment and thesis students


Court says foreign students can change courses and fail exams

Court of Appeal hope for married asylum seekers

Asylum seekers can't work, but they can get an education

Implications of MDC victory on Zim refugees

How the Home Office carry out raids

UK poised to resume deportations to Zim

If Simba Makoni becomes President...

Leave to remain in the UK on health grounds

Obtaining visa on basis of access to children

UK asylum decision throws lifeline for Zim teachers

Bvunzawabaya: Of UK legacy cases and amnesty

Msipa: What chance for a UK amnesty for 'illegal' workers?

Pitfalls of the Spouse Visa

AA immigration case ruling explained

New changes to UK immigration rules

UK extends ILR qualifying period

Of dodgy bus passes, amnesties and a looming judgment

When is 'indefinite leave to remain' not permanent?

Key developments in UK immigration law in 2005

UK leave to remain for children, spouses

Legal advice as good as facts presented

The incestral visa

The minister of religion visa

Justice Mungwira and judicial independence

Taffy Nyawanza: Immigration options for victims of domestic violence

Taffy Nywanza: Implications of UK asylum decison

Taffy Nyawanza: The right to family life

Taffy Nyawanza: New UK changes to managed migration

Taffy Nyawanza: UK immigration rules on marriage, domestic servants

Taffy Nyawanza: Switching from work permit to indefinite stay

Taffy Nyawanza: Immigration and you

Taffy Nyawanza: Makosi and the real Big Brother

By Taffy Nyawanza

THE Asylum and Immigration Tribunal has just notified an important decision that clarifies the oft asked question; can a student writing a thesis work more than the permitted 20 hours? The answer is no, and this decision should serve as a salutary warning to students in ‘writing up’ but with student visas.

The appellant in OG (Student – thesis – term time employment) Nigeria [2008] UKAIT 00057 had obtained various extensions as a student, and lately sought further leave to remain as a student in order to study for an MBA.

The application was refused on the basis that he had not shown that he had not engaged in business or taken employment without the consent of the Secretary of State for Employment in the light of wage slips produced which showed that he had consistently worked for over twenty hours a week.

On reconsideration, his argument was that while he had worked over the allowed time, the issue was what was meant by "term time" since he had been writing up a thesis during the period in question.

The decision identified, among other issues to be determined, the issue of how "vacation" should be construed, particularly with reference to cases involving a thesis and student cases generally and whether or not the appellant acted in breach of his conditions of leave.

The Home Office’s argument was simply that the fact that the appellant was writing up a thesis did not preclude him from the obligation to work for no more than twenty hours during term time. This was because it had been made clear to him on grant of leave that the appellant could work full-time during vacation periods but that he must not work more than twenty hours per week during term time, and whether a person was studying by attending classes during a course or writing a thesis or dissertation, the obligation remained the same.

The appellant’s argument was equally simple; that the period in question was a period when he was doing his ‘writing-up’ but not "term time" and, therefore, he was not restricted. Reference was made to a letter in which it was pointed out that due to the fact that the appellant only had to do his thesis, there was no term time schedule but that he had to brief and give his supervisor reports of his progress on the work with a given period by which to submit his thesis.

The Tribunal began by considering that the purpose behind the Immigration Rules was that leave to enter the United Kingdom or to remain in the United Kingdom for the purpose of study is not to be equated with a work permit. The Tribunal pointed out that when a person comes to the United Kingdom to study, it is follows that concomitant with that permission, the essential purpose of their stay is to study.

Further, it was clear that a student in the United Kingdom, having been granted leave to enter for the purpose of study, is permitted to work full-time during vacation periods but is allowed to work no more than twenty hours per week during term time. The Tribunal confirmed that this was for the obvious reason that it is expected that he will spend significant amounts of his time in study.

On the other hand, a person who has leave for writing up a thesis (which was not the position in this case) is relieved of the obligation to work only 20 hours. But where a person has leave as a student, it made no difference that he was writing up a thesis at that time rather than attending classes at the university. The obligation to work for no more than twenty hours per week during the term time of that university was an obligation that extended to him even given the nature of the academic work he was doing at that time.

The Tribunal therefore concluded that the Home Office was right to assess the appellant as having breached the requirements of the student immigration rules and to refuse his application for extension as a student.

Hopefully, this case clarifies a very common misconception amongst post-graduate students doing their ‘write-ups’ and saves them from coming to grief on this point.

Taffy Nyawanza works for Bake & Co Solicitors of Birmingham. He can be contacted on info@bakesolicitors.co.uk, ph. 0121 616 5025 or visit Bake & Co Solicitors’ website at www.bakesolicitors.co.uk.

Disclaimer: This article only provides general information and guidance on immigration law. It is not intended to replace the advice or services of a solicitor. The specific facts that apply to your matter may make the outcome different than would be anticipated by you. The writer will not accept any liability for any claims or inconvenience as a result of the use of this information.
JOIN THE DEBATE ON THIS ARTICLE ON THE NEWZIMBABWE.COM FORUMS


All material copyright newzimbabwe.com
Material may be published or reproduced in any form with appropriate credit to this website