|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
OPINION |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Mugabe can, and must face justice By Lynette
Mhlanga Because of political correctness, any discussion about the liability and accountability of Robert Mugabe for human rights violations is considered unhelpful. Mugabe is a demagogue, a pariah and enemy to his own people such that this topic engenders controversies but mostly it triggers fear and some of the responses given are all iced by fear. The result is that
we tend to act as if Mugabe cannot be prosecuted for the human rights
violations which he continues to perpetrate using state machinery. This article will not argue on who said what at Morgan Tsvangirai's London meeting but will address the burning issue here – can Mugabe be prosecuted for the human rights violations committed under his watch and direction? Much legal ingenuity has been deployed to discuss this problem. However, the realistic answer to this conundrum that Mugabe can indeed, and should be prosecuted. The dictator, the demagogue the strongman and slaughter of the innocent civilians can be prosecuted. He ranks on the
same level with Slobodan Milosevic, Saddam Hussein, Idi Amin, Alexander
Lukashenko and their kind. Therefore he can be indicted. The UN Security Council can indict nationals of countries that have not signed the International Criminal Court statute for trial before the court. Mugabe is an example of a possible case, whose indictment has been called for by Australia and New Zealand. Recently the UN Security Council did a referral over Sudan’s Darfur situation and Mugabe must be held accountable for the crimes he has committed. A UN Security Council referral to the International Criminal Court to investigate Mugabe and his regime, similar to the referral over Sudan's Darfur situation, is the most appropriate and effective response.
Msipa argued that
“Zimbabwe’s situation is precariously different because
we have not ratified the ICC Statute. This makes it rather difficult
for the ICC to investigate our cases”. This conclusion is
wrong as it entirely does not appreciate the UN Security Council‘s
powers to bring individuals before the ICC even when their states are
not signatories. The UN Security Council can exercise its wide discretionary
powers. It can specifically name Robert Mugabe as an ongoing threat
to peace and security of the region and authorize an ICC investigation,
even though Zimbabwe has refused to accept the court's jurisdiction. Once an indictment
is done by the UN Security Council, a warrant could be issued for Mugabe’s
arrest and only then will the people of Zimbabwe breath a sigh of relief.
Let us be honest here, Mugabe is a human rights violator and our people
are suffering. Instead of being diplomatic about this issue, as is currently
being done, we need to simply say no to human rights abuses; we need
to take a stance against an unrepentant dictator who is insensitive
to the cries of his own people |
|||||||||||||||||
| All material copyright newzimbabwe.com Material may be published or reproduced in any form with appropriate credit to this website |
|||||||||||||||||